ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Learning receptive field properties of complex cells in V1.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motion perception with visual prostheses.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026Review
- Simulated Complex Cells Contribute to Object Recognition Through Representational Untangling.Neural computation · 2026Article
- Do the receptive fields in the primary visual cortex span a variability over the degree of elongation of the receptive fields?Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Orientation selectivity properties for the affine Gaussian derivative and the affine Gabor models for visual receptive fields.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Orientation selectivity properties for integrated affine quasi quadrature models of complex cells.PloS one · 2025Article
- Receptive-field nonlinearities in primary auditory cortex: a comparative perspective.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- A spatiotemporal energy model based on spiking neurons for human motion perception.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Article
- Primate V2 Receptive Fields Derived from Anatomically Identified Large-Scale V1 Inputs.Research square · 2024Article
- Object recognition in primates: what can early visual areas contribute?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Learning the Vector Coding of Egocentric Boundary Cells from Visual Data.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Artificial Visual System for Orientation Detection Based on Hubel-Wiesel Model.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are two distinct classes of cells in the primary visual cortex (V1): simple cells and complex cells. One defining feature of complex cells is their spatial phase invariance; they respond strongly to oriented grating stimuli with a preferred orientation but with a wide range of spatial phases. A classical model of complete spatial phase invariance in complex cells is the energy model, in which the responses are the sum of the squared outputs of two linear spatially phase-shifted filters. However, recent experimental studies have shown that complex cells have a diverse range of spatial phase invariance and only a subset can be characterized by the energy model. While several models have been proposed to explain how complex cells could learn to be selective to orientation but invariant to spatial phase, most existing models overlook many biologically important details. We propose a biologically plausible model for complex cells that learns to pool inputs from simple cells based on the presentation of natural scene stimuli. The model is a three-layer network with rate-based neurons that describes the activities of LGN cells (layer 1), V1 simple cells (layer 2), and V1 complex cells (layer 3). The first two layers implement a recently proposed simple cell model that is biologically plausible and accounts for many experimental phenomena. The neural dynamics of the complex cells is modeled as the integration of simple cells inputs along with response normalization. Connections between LGN and simple cells are learned using Hebbian and anti-Hebbian plasticity. Connections between simple and complex cells are learned using a modified version of the Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (BCM) rule. Our results demonstrate that the learning rule can describe a diversity of complex cells, similar to those observed experimentally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.