ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2021
iPhantom: A Framework for Automated Creation of Individualized Computational Phantoms and Its Application to CT Organ Dosimetry.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phantom studies in medical imaging (PSMI): a guide with recommendations and checklist.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- A scoping review of human digital twins in healthcare applications and usage patterns.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- XCAT 3.0: A comprehensive library of personalized digital twins derived from CT scans.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Digital Twins for Clinical and Operational Decision-Making: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Digital twins in nuclear medicine: A proposition of a modular pipeline for dosimetry protocol optimization in molecular radiotherapy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Definitions and Characteristics of Patient Digital Twins Being Developed for Clinical Use: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Cyber-Physical Perception Interface for Co-Simulation Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Thyroid Cancer Central Lymph Node Metastasis Risk Stratification Based on Homogeneous Positioning Deep Learning.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Surface-based anthropomorphic bone structures for use in high-resolution simulated medical imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Literature review of digital twin in healthcare.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Fully automated accurate patient positioning in computed tomography using anterior-posterior localizer images and a deep neural network: a dual-center study.European radiology · 2023Article
- TransMorph: Transformer for unsupervised medical image registration.Medical image analysis · 2022Article
- A GPU-accelerated framework for individualized estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate a novel framework, iPhantom, for automated creation of patient-specific phantoms or "digital-twins (DT)" using patient medical images. The framework is applied to assess radiation dose to radiosensitive organs in CT imaging of individual patients.
methodGiven a volume of patient CT images, iPhantom segments selected anchor organs and structures (e.g., liver, bones, pancreas) using a learning-based model developed for multi-organ CT segmentation. Organs which are challenging to segment (e.g., intestines) are incorporated from a matched phantom template, using a diffeomorphic registration model developed for multi-organ phantom-voxels. The resulting digital-twin phantoms are used to assess organ doses during routine CT exams.
resultiPhantom was validated on both with a set of XCAT digital phantoms (n = 50) and an independent clinical dataset (n = 10) with similar accuracy. iPhantom precisely predicted all organ locations yielding Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) 0.6 - 1 for anchor organs and DSC of 0.3-0.9 for all other organs. iPhantom showed <10% errors in estimated radiation dose for the majority of organs, which was notably superior to the state-of-the-art baseline method (20-35% dose errors).
conclusioniPhantom enables automated and accurate creation of patient-specific phantoms and, for the first time, provides sufficient and automated patient-specific dose estimates for CT dosimetry. SIGNIFICANCE: The new framework brings the creation and application of CHPs (computational human phantoms) to the level of individual CHPs through automation, achieving wide and precise organ localization, paving the way for clinical monitoring, personalized optimization, and large-scale research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.