ArticleMedical physics2021
In vivo evaluation of angulated needle-guide template for MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interleaved Imaging and Actuation for Real-Time MRI During Active Control of a Magnetically-Actuated Robotic Catheter.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of a Novel Robotic Device for MR-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Initial Patient Experience.Journal of medical robotics research · 2026Article
- Technical Validation of a Training Workstation for Magnet-Based Ultrasound Guidance of Fine-Needle Punctures.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SlicerROS2: A research and development module for image-guided robotic interventions.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024Article
- IRE made easy: introducing the robotic grid system for multiple parallel needle insertion in irreversible electroporation treatment.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Motorized template for MRI-guided focal cryoablation of prostate cancer.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2023Article
- MR conditional prostate intervention systems and actuations review.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transperineal prostate biopsy has been practiced since the early 2000s. The technique often suffers from targeting error due to deviation of the needle as a result of physical interaction between the needle and inhomogeneous tissues. Existing needle guide devices, such as a grid template, do not allow choosing an alternative insertion path to mitigate the deviation because of their limited degree-of-freedom (DoF). This study evaluates how an angulated needle insertion path can reduce needle deviation and improve needle placement accuracy.
methodsWe extended a robotic needle-guidance device (Smart Template) for in-bore MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy. The new Smart Template has a 4-DoF needle-guiding mechanism allowing a translational range of motion of 65 and 58 mm along the vertical and horizontal axis, and a needle rotational motion around the vertical and horizontal axis
resultsWe analyzed 46 in vivo insertions using either straight or angulated insertions paths. The experiment showed that the proposed strategy of selecting straight or angulated insertions based on the subject's anatomy outperformed the conventional approach of just straight insertions in terms of targeting accuracy (2.4 mm [1.3-3.7] vs 3.9 mm [2.4-5.0] {Median
conclusionThe in vivo experiment successfully demonstrated that an angulated needle insertion path could improve needle placement accuracy with a path planning strategy that takes account of the subject-specific anatomical structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.