Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33651320›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2021

Constraints on vocal production learning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates).

Michael S Osmanski, Yoshimasa Seki, Robert J Dooling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael S OsmanskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21025, USA.
Yoshimasa SekiDepartment of Psychology, Aichi University, Toyohashi, 4418522, Japan.
Robert J DoolingDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. rdooling@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0371-1858

Funding

CORE--IMAGINGP30DC004664 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MOSS, CYNTHIA F · 2002 to 2012
$3.5M
BIOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF VOCAL LEARNINGR01DC000198 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI DOOLING, ROBERT J · 1989 to 2008
$1.9M
Precision/Acoustic Variation: Vocal ProductionF31DC006766 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI OSMANSKI, MICHAEL SCOTT · 2004 to 2006
$91k
SINGLE UNIT AND BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES TO ODORANT SERIESF32DC000198 · NIDCD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI DORRIES, KATHLEEN M · 1995 to 1997
–
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC006766NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000198NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are small Australian parrots with a well-documented, learned vocal repertoire and a high degree of vocal production learning. These birds live in large, social flocks and they vocally interact with each other in a dynamic, reciprocal manner. We assume that budgerigars must process and integrate a wide variety of sensory stimuli when selecting appropriate vocal responses to conspecifics during vocal interactions, but the relative contributions of these different stimuli to that process are next to impossible to tease apart in a natural context. Here we show that budgerigars, under operant control, can learn to respond to specific stimuli with a specific vocal response. Budgerigars were trained to produce contact calls to a combination of auditory and visual cues. Birds learned to produce specific contact calls to stimuli that differed either in location (visual or auditory) or quality (visual). Interestingly, the birds could not learn to associate different vocal responses with different auditory stimuli coming from the same location. Surprisingly, this was so even when the auditory stimuli and the responses were the same (i.e., the bird's own contact call). These results show that even in a highly controlled operant context, acoustic cues alone were not sufficient to support vocal production learning in budgerigars. From a different perspective, these results highlight the significant role that social interaction likely plays in vocal production learning so elegantly shown by Irene Pepperberg's work in parrots.

Indexed as

MelopsittacusParrotsAnimalsAustraliaLearningVocalization, AnimalBudgerigarOperant controlVocal production learning

Identifiers

PMID33651320
PMCPMC7979668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.