Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33651318›Full record

ArticlePituitary2021

Clinical profiles of silent corticotroph adenomas compared with silent gonadotroph adenomas after adopting the 2017 WHO pituitary classification system.

Shenzhong Jiang, Jianyu Zhu, Ming Feng, Yong Yao, Kan Deng, Bing Xing, Wei Lian, Renzhi Wang, Xinjie Bao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shenzhong JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jianyu ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ming FengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yong YaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Kan DengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Bing XingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wei LianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Renzhi WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. wangrz@126.com.
Xinjie BaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Pituitary Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. baoxinjie1@pumch.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2117-7692
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Beijing Nova Program Z181100006218003CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2016-I2M-1-017National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFA0108600Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (CN) 7182134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSilent corticotroph adenomas (SCAs) can be redefined according to the 2017 World Health Organization pituitary classification system with the introduction of T‑PIT, a transcription factor. We studied the clinical features of these redefined SCAs.

methodsWe compared 112 patients with SCAs and 198 patients with silent gonadotroph adenomas (SGAs) who underwent surgery from January 2019 to May 2020.

resultsThe prevalence of SCAs increased from 21.3 to 30.2% under the new classification rules. T-PIT-positive, adrenocorticotropic hormone-negative SCAs and T-PIT-positive, adrenocorticotropic hormone-positive SCAs exhibited similar clinical features. SCAs exhibited significant female preponderance (90.2% vs. 29.8%, P < 0.0001); more frequent invasion (36.6% vs. 7.6%, P < 0.0001), especially multiple-site invasion (P < 0.0001); and marked cystic changes on imaging compared with SGAs (54.5% vs. 19.2%, P < 0.0001). SCAs had a softer tumor consistency (89.2% vs. 61.1%, P < 0.0001). Gross total resection was achieved in 66.1% of SCAs and 66.2% of SGAs (P > 0.9999). The overall recurrence/progression rates of SCAs and SGAs were 9.8% and 6.6% at 14.1 and 13.5 months of follow-up, respectively (P = 0.3765). The proportion of patients with more than two recurrences requiring multiple surgeries and radiation was similar between SCAs and SGAs (7.1% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.1514). However, multiple recurrences of SCAs affected younger patients than SGAs (39.0 vs. 53.5 years, P = 0.0433).

conclusionsThe prevalence of SCAs increased with the introduction of T-PIT. SCAs and SGAs exhibited comparable size and recurrence/progression rates, but SCAs showed increased invasion and more marked cystic change. Aggressive SCAs tended to affect younger patients. Close long-term monitoring for SCA recurrence/progression is required.

Indexed as

ACTH-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaAdrenocorticotropic HormoneFemaleGonadotrophsHumansRecurrenceWorld Health OrganizationAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAggressiveInvasionSilent corticotroph adenomaSilent gonadotroph adenomaTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID33651318
OpenAlexW3134932644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.