Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33651315›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Application of robotic single-site surgery with optional additional port for endometriosis: a single institution's experience.

Yi Huang, Kristina Duan, Tamisa Koythong, Ninad M Patil, Dazhi Fan, Juan Liu, Zhenkun Guan, Xiaoming Guan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi HuangDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, 10th floor, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Kristina DuanDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, 10th floor, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Tamisa KoythongDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, 10th floor, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Ninad M PatilDepartment of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Dazhi FanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Juan LiuThird Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Zhenkun GuanThird Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoming GuanDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, 10th floor, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. xiaoming@bcm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of treating stage I-IV endometriosis patients with robotic single-site surgery (RSSS). A retrospective chart review was conducted on 334 patients with endometriosis treated by a single surgeon at a university hospital from January 2015 to November 2019. Surgeries were performed in a single institution between 2015 and 2019. All patients presented with pelvic pain and underwent surgical resection of the lesion. American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) standards were used to classify endometriosis. The primary goal of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of RSSS for surgical resection of stage I-IV endometriosis patients. We will compare patient characteristics and surgical parameters, such as blood loss, operating time, and postoperative complications, across different endometriosis stages to evaluate the effectiveness of this novel technique. RSSS was used for all cases, with no conversions to laparotomy or traditional laparoscopy. One to two additional ports were placed in 41 patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) involving the colorectal and urinary tract and/or extensive pelvic adhesions. Across patient groups, there were no significant differences in age, BMI, fertility history, abdominal surgery history, and hysterectomy ratio (P > 0.05). The median operation time was 140.25 min (range: 85.50-260.00 min, P < 0.05) and median blood loss was 31.25 mL (range: 15-100 mL, P < 0.05). Histopathology supported the diagnosis in 259/334 patients. The undiagnosed patients were associated with lower ASRM scores. For 83.3% of patients (295/334), the length of hospital stay was < 24 h. The postoperative complication rate was 6.0% (20/334), although only two cases were severe. Our results indicate that RSSS is an alternative, safe, and acceptable platform for the surgical treatment of all stages of endometriosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHysterectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChronic pelvic painEndometriosisLESSRoboticSingle-site surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.