Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33651278›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Implications of response shift for micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making using results of patient-reported outcome measures.

Richard Sawatzky, Jae-Yung Kwon, Ruth Barclay, Cynthia Chauhan, Lori Frank, Wilbert B van den Hout, Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen, Sandra Nolte, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Response Shift – in Sync Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Integration of early palliative care in cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of 39 randomized controlled trials on clinical outcomes and management optimization.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Impact of response shift on change in patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Response shift results of quantitative research using patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-regression analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Response shift results of quantitative research using patient-reported outcome measures: a descriptive systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Multilevel Conceptualization and Measurement of Person-Centeredness.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comment on "Association between child ADHD and caregivers' mental health and health-related quality of life: results from a population-based study".Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada. rick.sawatzky@twu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-190X
Jae-Yung KwonSchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada.
Ruth BarclayDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Cynthia ChauhanPatient Representative, Wichita, KS, USA.
Lori FrankBehavioral & Policy Sciences, RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA.
Wilbert B van den HoutMedical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lene Kongsgaard NielsenDepartment of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sandra NolteICON GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Mirjam A G SprangersDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Research Institute Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Response Shift – in Sync Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResults of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to inform healthcare decision-making. Research has shown that response shift can impact PROM results. As part of an international collaboration, our goal is to provide a framework regarding the implications of response shift at the level of patient care (micro), healthcare institute (meso), and healthcare policy (macro).

methodsEmpirical evidence of response shift that can influence patients' self-reported health and preferences provided the foundation for development of the framework. Measurement validity theory, hermeneutic philosophy, and micro-, meso-, and macro-level healthcare decision-making informed our theoretical analysis.

resultsAt the micro-level, patients' self-reported health needs to be interpreted via dialogue with the clinician to avoid misinterpretation of PROM data due to response shift. It is also important to consider the potential impact of response shift on study results, when these are used to support decisions. At the meso-level, individual-level data should be examined for response shift before aggregating PROM data for decision-making related to quality improvement, performance monitoring, and accreditation. At the macro-level, critical reflection on the conceptualization of health is required to know whether response shift needs to be controlled for when PROM data are used to inform healthcare coverage.

conclusionGiven empirical evidence of response shift, there is a critical need for guidelines and knowledge translation to avoid potential misinterpretations of PROM results and consequential biases in decision-making. Our framework with guiding questions provides a structure for developing strategies to address potential impacts of response shift at micro-, meso-, and macro-levels.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeDelivery of Health CareHealth PolicyHumansQuality ImprovementHealthcare decision-makingHealth policyOrganizationPatientPatient-reported outcomesResponse shift

Identifiers

PMID33651278
PMCPMC8602130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.