ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Long-term comparative study on open versus laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Revisional Surgery After Bilio-Pancreatic Diversion: Indications, Outcomes, and Complications in a High-Volume Center.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo date, bariatric surgery has been proposed as the most effective treatment to resolve morbid obesity, a multifactorial chronic disease with an epidemic and increasing tendency. The purpose of this study was to determinate the impact of the laparoscopy on weight loss parameters in morbid obese patients who underwent surgery according to Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and evaluate early and late complications related to the open and laparoscopic approach of this technique. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a longitudinal retrospective study in consecutive patients undergoing BPD due to morbid obesity between 1999 and 2015. From 2006 the laparoscopic technique was introduced in our group for obesity surgery. In both approaches, open and laparoscopic surgery, the procedure performed consists of a proximal gastric section with a long Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The following variables were assessed in the two groups: intervention duration (min), estimated blood loss (mL), conversions to open approach (%), preoperative stay, postoperative and global stay (days). Complications were divided into early and late postoperative complications. The early surgical complications were catalogued according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
resultsTwo hundred seventy-seven patients were consecutively enrolled and divided in two groups: open BPD and laparoscopic BPD. There were no significant differences in the comparison of the two groups and the mean age was 43.9 years (19-60) with a mean BMI of 52.5 kg/m
conclusionsLaparoscopic BPD is a safe technique that allows a shorter hospital stay compared to open surgery and that allows a drastic reduction in the incidence of incisional hernias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33651166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.