Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650784›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Testing an analogue game to promote peer support and person-centredness in education for people with diabetes: A realist evaluation.

Vibeke Stenov, Pil Lindgreen, Ingrid Willaing, Henning Grubb Basballe, Lene Eide Joensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vibeke StenovDiabetes Management Research, Health Promotion Research Unit, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-5380
Pil LindgreenDiabetes Management Research, Health Promotion Research Unit, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-5498
Ingrid WillaingDiabetes Management Research, Health Promotion Research Unit, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Henning Grubb BasballeCopenhagen Game Lab, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene Eide JoensenDiabetes Management Research, Health Promotion Research Unit, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the outcomes of testing an analogue game to incorporate person-centredness and peer dialogues in group-based diabetes education targeting people with diabetes.

designRealist evaluation using quantitative and qualitative methods to explore context, mechanisms and outcomes of the intervention.

methodsIn March-July 2019, the game was tested among 76 people with type 2 diabetes and 17 professionals in 19 settings across nine Danish municipalities. Data consisted of game tests, interviews and questionnaires. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation and descriptive statistics.

resultsOutcomes of using the game were as follows: (a) a playful atmosphere; (b) active engagement; c) reflections on diabetes-specific experiences; (d) focused dialogues; (e) professionals gaining insight into the needs of participants; and (f) professionals experiencing peer dialogue as important to incorporate into education. Questionnaire responses showed that 92% people with diabetes and 94% professionals found that the game incorporated person-centredness and peer dialogues into education.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Educational StatusHealth EducationHumansSurveys and Questionnairesdialogue toolsgamegamificationnursingpatient educationpeer supportperson-centrednessrealist evaluationself-managementtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID33650784
PMCPMC8363400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.