ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2021
Gynaecological cancers and their cell lines.
Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted modulation of IGFL2-AS1 reveals its translational potential in cervical adenocarcinoma.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Targeting FGFR signaling overcomes therapeutic resistance and immune evasion in oncogenic PIK3CA-driven serous-like endometrial cancer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- HaCaT Keratinocytes: A Differentiation-Competent Platform for Episomal Replication of HPV Type 11.Viruses · 2026Article
- The Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay as a Short-Term Exploratory Model for Cervical Cancer Research.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unveiling Metabolic Subtypes in Endometrial Cancer Cell Lines: Insights from Metabolomic Analysis Under Standard and Stress Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Ring-fused chlorin-enhanced photodynamic therapy for effective cell death induction in endometrial cancer.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025Article
- Functional Profiling of p53 and RB Cell Cycle Regulatory Proficiency Suggests Mechanism-Driven Molecular Stratification in Endometrial Carcinoma.Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Data-Driven Modelling of Substituted Pyrimidine and Uracil-Based Derivatives Validated with Newly Synthesized and Antiproliferative Evaluated Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Identification and subsequent validation of transcriptomic signature associated with metabolic status in endometrial cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Tumor Organoid and Spheroid Models for Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Knockdown of the stem cell marker Musashi-1 inhibits endometrial cancer growth and sensitizes cells to radiation.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
- Article
- Gynaecological cancers and their cell lines.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Review
- Breaking Physiological Barriers in Women's Health: Mucoadhesive and Stimuli-Responsive Nanomaterials.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell lines are widely used for various research purposes including cancer and drug research. Recently, there have been studies that pointed to discrepancies in the literature and usage of cell lines. That is why we have prepared a comprehensive overview of the most common gynaecological cancer cell lines, their literature, a list of currently available cell lines, and new findings compared with the original studies. A literature review was conducted via MEDLINE, PubMed and ScienceDirect for reviews in the last 5 years to identify research and other studies related to gynaecological cancer cell lines. We present an overview of the current literature with reference to the original studies and pointed to certain inconsistencies in the literature. The adherence to culturing rulesets and the international guidelines helps in minimizing replication failure between institutions. Evidence from the latest research suggests that despite certain drawbacks, variations of cancer cell lines can also be useful in regard to a more diverse genomic landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.