ArticleStatistics in medicine2021
uTPI: A utility-based toxicity probability interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defining Utility as a Measure of Preference Under Uncertainty in Phase I-II Oncology Dose Finding Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- A Biomarker-Based Dose-Schedule Optimization Design for Immunotherapy Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- BARD: A seamless two-stage dose optimization design integrating backfill and adaptive randomization.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Determining doses for backfill cohorts based on patient-reported outcome.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Statistical and practical considerations in planning and conduct of dose-optimization trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Review
- Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Review
- A software tool for both the maximum tolerated dose and the optimal biological dose finding trials in early phase designs.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
- BIPSE: A biomarker-based phase I/II design for immunotherapy trials with progression-free survival endpoint.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Seamless Phase I-II Cancer Clinical Trials Using Kernel-Based Covariate Similarity.Pharmaceutical statisticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike chemotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy may not pose significant clinical benefit over the lower doses. By simultaneously considering both toxicity and efficacy endpoints, phase I/II trials can identify a more clinically meaningful dose for subsequent phase II trials than traditional toxicity-based phase I trials in terms of risk-benefit tradeoff. To strengthen and simplify the current practice of phase I/II trials, we propose a utility-based toxicity probability interval (uTPI) design for finding the optimal biological dose, based on a numerical utility that provides a clinically meaningful, one-dimensional summary representation of the patient's bivariate toxicity and efficacy outcome. The uTPI design does not rely on any parametric specification of the dose-response relationship, and it directly models the dose desirability through a quasi binomial likelihood. Toxicity probability intervals are used to screen out overly toxic dose levels, and then the dose escalation/de-escalation decisions are made adaptively by comparing the posterior desirability distributions of the adjacent levels of the current dose. The uTPI design is flexible in accommodating various dose desirability formulations, while only requiring minimum design parameters. It has a clear decision structure such that a dose-assignment decision table can be calculated before the trial starts and can be used throughout the trial, which simplifies the practical implementation of the design. Extensive simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed uTPI design yields desirable as well as robust performance under various scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.