Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650473›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2022

Recovery efficiency of two glove-sampling methods.

Amanda K Lyons, Laura J Rose, Judith Noble-Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. An Advanced Tape-Stripping Approach for High-Efficiency Sampling on Non-Absorbent Surfaces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda K LyonsDivision of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-2481
Laura J RoseDivision of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Judith Noble-WangDivision of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-5090-5025

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two methods to sample pathogens from gloved hands were compared: direct imprint onto agar and a sponge-wipe method. The sponge method was significantly better at recovering Clostridiodes difficile spores, and no difference was observed between the methods at 101 inoculum for carbapenemase-producing KPC+ Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Acinetobacter baumannii.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33650473
PMCPMC11320719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.