Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650343›Full record

ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2021

The 2020 Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Hideki Tokunaga, Mikio Mikami, Satoru Nagase, Yoichi Kobayashi, Tsutomu Tabata, Masanori Kaneuchi, Toyomi Satoh, Yasuyuki Hirashima, Noriomi Matsumura, Yoshihito Yokoyama and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intraoperative Collection of Ascitic Fluid With Intra- or Postoperative Reinfusion in Ovarian Cancer: Safety and Feasibility of a Roller Pumping Method.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Hideki TokunagaDepartment of Gynecology, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan. hideki.tokunaga.a1@tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-3810
Mikio MikamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-3518
Satoru NagaseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5212-1128
Yoichi KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-0625
Tsutomu TabataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-8180
Masanori KaneuchiDepartment of Gynecology, Otaru General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2479-1164
Toyomi SatohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6929-5463
Yasuyuki HirashimaDepartment of Gynecology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0269-9313
Noriomi MatsumuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4512-7975
Yoshihito YokoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5214-512X
Kei KawanaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-8830
Satoru KyoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8986-6147
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-8326
Hidetaka KatabuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2403-6134
Hirosaki University · JPKeio University · JPKindai University · JPKumamoto University · JPKyorin University · JPNihon University · JPOtaru Municipal Hospital · JPShimane University · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPTohoku University Hospital · JPTokai University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fifth edition of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer was published in 2020. The guidelines contain 6 chapters-namely, (1) overview of the guidelines; (2) epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (3) recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (4) borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary; (5) malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary; and (6) malignant sex cord-stromal tumors. Furthermore, the guidelines comprise 5 algorithms-namely, (1) initial treatment for ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (2) treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer; (3) initial treatment for borderline epithelial ovarian tumor; (4) treatment for malignant germ cell tumor; and (5) treatment for sex cord-stromal tumor. Major changes in the new edition include the following: (1) revision of the title to "guidelines for the treatment of ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer"; (2) involvement of patients and general (male/female) participants in addition to physicians, pharmacists, and nurses; (3) clinical questions (CQs) in the PICO format; (4) change in the expression of grades of recommendation and level of evidence in accordance with the GRADE system; (5) introduction of the idea of a body of evidence; (6) categorization of references according to research design; (7) performance of systematic reviews and meta-analysis for three CQs; and (8) voting for each CQ/recommendation and description of the consensus.

Indexed as

Fallopian Tube NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansJapanMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPractice Guidelines as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicClinical Practice GuidelineFallopian Tube NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33650343
PMCPMC7930451
OpenAlexW3132819990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.