Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650228›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Beyond knowledge: Evaluating the practices and precautionary measures towards COVID-19 amongst medical doctors in Jordan.

Mohannad Ramadan, Zuheir Hasan, Tareq Saleh, Mahmoud Jaradat, Mohammad Al-Hazaimeh, Omar Bani Hani, Ala'a B Al-Tammemi, Enas Shorman, Abdel-Hameed Al-Mistarehi, Khalid Kheirallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohannad RamadanDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Zuheir HasanDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Tareq SalehDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2878-1107
Mahmoud JaradatDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
Mohammad Al-HazaimehDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
Omar Bani HaniDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Al-Bashir Hospital, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Ala'a B Al-TammemiDoctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0862-0186
Enas ShormanDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Abdel-Hameed Al-MistarehiDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4713-8536
Khalid KheirallahDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-4472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth Care Workers (HCWs), including medical doctors, played a pivotal role as a first-line defence against the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of high exposure, HCWs are at an increased risk of contracting the disease.

aimsThis study aims to assess the level of precautionary measures, both at home and the workplace, amongst medical doctors who were on duty during the national lockdown in Jordan.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between March 23 and May 1, 2020, utilising a self-administered web-based questionnaire to examine a sample of medical doctors (n = 270) working at different healthcare institutions in Jordan. Likert scale was used to code the data and generate means and percentages.

resultsThe most practiced on-duty precautionary measures were cleaning hands with water and disinfectant for more than 20 seconds (47.4%), followed by proper hygiene before and during meals (38.9%). The most practiced off-duty measures were taking off clothes before entering the residential place (65.9%) and prohibiting visitors (58.1%). Overall, the mean work protection percentage score was 73.8% (range: 28%-100%), while the mean home safety percentage score was 71.3% (range: 25%-100%). Work protection score was positively correlated with the home safety score. Female doctors were found to be more precautious at home than males. Doctors with chronic illness(es) were found to be less precautious than their healthier counterparts. Participants who isolated themselves expressed the highest level of home safety practice. Doctors who reported to smoke were found more precautious at home and doctors who preferred to work during lockdowns were more precautious at the workplace.

conclusionThe level of precautionary behaviour of medical doctors in Jordan was not optimal. More attention and efforts are needed to enhance the adherence of doctors to precautionary guidance. Strengthening the role of infectious disease and infection control units within healthcare settings remains a necessity.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansJordanMaleSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33650228
PMCPMC7995122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.