Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650197›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Comparison of losartan and amlodipine effects on the outcomes of patient with COVID-19 and primary hypertension: A randomised clinical trial.

Masoud Nouri-Vaskeh, Niusha Kalami, Ramin Zand, Zahra Soroureddin, Mojtaba Varshochi, Khalil Ansarin, Haleh Rezaee, Ali Taghizadieh, Armin Sadeghi, Masoud Ahangari Maleki and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effects of Losartan on Patients Hospitalized for Acute COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The authors reply.Critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Molnupiravir: A new candidate for COVID-19 treatment.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Masoud Nouri-VaskehImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Niusha KalamiTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ramin ZandDepartment of Neurology, Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.
Zahra SoroureddinCardiovascular Division, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mojtaba VarshochiTropical and Infectious Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Khalil AnsarinTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Haleh RezaeeTropical and Infectious Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali TaghizadiehTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Armin SadeghiTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Masoud Ahangari MalekiTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Azam EsmailnajadTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Parviz SalehKidney Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mehdi HaghdoostTropical and Infectious Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mehdi MalekiCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Akbar SharifiTuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-2028
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRGeisinger Neuroscience Institute · USImam Hossein Hospital · IR

Funding

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 65204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControversy exists regarding the drug selection in hypertension (HTN) management in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to compare the effects of losartan and amlodipine in patients with primary HTN and COVID-19.

methodsIn this randomised clinical trial, hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and primary HTN were enrolled in the study. One arm received losartan, 25 mg, twice a day and the other arm received amlodipine, 5 mg per day for 2 weeks. The main outcomes were compare 30-day mortality rate and length of hospital stay.

resultsThe mean age of patients treated with losartan (N = 41) and amlodipine (N = 39) was 67.3 ± 14.8 and 60.1 ± 17.3 years, respectively (P value = .068). The length of hospital stay in losartan and amlodipine groups was 4.57 ± 2.59 and 7.30 ± 8.70 days, respectively (P value = .085). Also, the length of ICU admission in losartan and amlodipine group was 7.13 ± 5.99 and 7.15 ± 9.95 days, respectively (P value = .994). The 30-day mortality was two and five patients in losartan and amlodipine groups, respectively (P value = .241).

conclusionsThere was no priority in losartan or amlodipine administration in COVID-19 patients with primary HTN in decreasing mortality rate, hospital and ICU length stay. Further studies need to clarify the first-line anti-HTN medications in COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19HypertensionAgedAged, 80 and overAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodHumansLosartanMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsLosartan

Identifiers

PMID33650197
PMCPMC7995089
OpenAlexW3134307067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.