Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650051›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Progress in nuclear energy with carbon pricing to achieve environmental sustainability agenda: on the edge of one's seat.

Muhammad Khalid Anser, Munir Ahmad, Muhammad Azhar Khan, Abdelmohsen A Nassani, Sameh E Askar, Khalid Zaman, Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi Abro, Ahmad Kabbani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Socio-economic and corporate factors and COVID-19 pandemic: a wake-up call.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad Khalid AnserSchool of Public Administration, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, 710000, China.
Munir AhmadSchool of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Muhammad Azhar KhanDepartment of Economics, University of Haripur, Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Abdelmohsen A NassaniDepartment of Management, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia.
Sameh E AskarDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 11451, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid ZamanDepartment of Economics, University of Haripur, Haripur, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. khalid_zaman786@yahoo.com.
Muhammad Moinuddin Qazi AbroDepartment of Management, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, P.O. Box 71115, Riyadh, 11587, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad KabbaniDepartment of Management, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.

Funding

King Saud University RSP-2020/167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Paris agreement (COP21) emphasized the need to progress toward using low-carbon energy technologies, including nuclear power, that is favorably looked for to meet the challenges to reduce an enormous increase in global temperature to below 2 °C. The cost of carbon pollution is highly induced by the energy sector that damages the global environmental sustainability plan. The alternative and nuclear energy demand is an optimized solution to decrease carbon damages, which can be better work under the imposition of carbon taxes on polluting industries. This study works in a given direction to analyze the role of alternative and nuclear energy, carbon pricing, FDI inflows, fossil fuel combustion, economic growth, and population density on the cost of carbon pollution in a panel of 90 selected countries for a period of 1995-2018. The results confirmed a "nuclear energy-augmented environmental Kuznets curve" with a turning point of 39.974% of total energy demand across countries. The result implies that alternative and nuclear energy initially increases carbon damages. Simultaneously, it decreases at the later stages of atomic energy expansion; thus, nuclear power growth is imperative for long-term sustainable development. A positive relationship is found between carbon pricing and carbon damage, while a negative relationship is between fossil fuel combustion and carbon damage across countries. The results conclude that expansion in nuclear energy would help reduce the cost of carbon pollution to achieve environmental sustainability agenda across countries.

Indexed as

CarbonNuclear EnergyCarbon DioxideCosts and Cost AnalysisEconomic DevelopmentParisRenewable EnergyCarbonCarbon DioxideCarbon damagesCarbon pricingDynamic panel GMMEnvironmental Kuznets curveFDI inflowsNuclear energy demand

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.