Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650042›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021

Improving tumor budding reporting in colorectal cancer: a Delphi consensus study.

Tariq Sami Haddad, Alessandro Lugli, Susan Aherne, Valeria Barresi, Benoît Terris, John-Melle Bokhorst, Scarlet Fiona Brockmoeller, Miriam Cuatrecasas, Femke Simmer, Hala El-Zimaity and 16 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
17.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tumor budding in gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic value and association with clinicopathological markers.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Few-shot Tumor Bud Segmentation Using Generative Model in Colorectal Carcinoma.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  17. Adapting SAM to Histopathology Images for Tumor Bud Segmentation in Colorectal Cancer.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. International journal of general medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 17 institutions in 14 countries.

Tariq Sami HaddadDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, Netherlands. tariq.haddad@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-9993
Alessandro LugliUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Susan AherneSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Valeria BarresiUniversity of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Benoît TerrisCochin Hospital, Paris, France.
John-Melle BokhorstDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Scarlet Fiona BrockmoellerUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, England.
Miriam CuatrecasasHospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Femke SimmerDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Hala El-ZimaityDynacare Laboratories, Brampton, Canada.
Jean-François FléjouSaint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
David GibbonsSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Gieri CathomasCantonal Hospital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland.
Richard KirschMt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Tine Plato KuhlmannHerlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cord LangnerMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Maurice B LoughreyRoyal Victoria Hospital and Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Robert RiddellMt. Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Ari RistimäkiUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sanjay KakarUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kieran SheahanSt. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Darren TreanorUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, England.
Jeroen van der LaakDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Michael ViethUniversity of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Inti ZlobecUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Iris D NagtegaalDepartment of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity College Dublin · IEMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Leeds · GBBrampton Civic Hospital · CAHerlev Hospital · DKHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESLinköping University · SEMedical University of Graz · ATQueen's University Belfast · GBSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Bayreuth · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 10602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor budding is a long-established independent adverse prognostic marker in colorectal cancer, yet methods for its assessment have varied widely. In an effort to standardize its reporting, a group of experts met in Bern, Switzerland, in 2016 to reach consensus on a single, international, evidence-based method for tumor budding assessment and reporting (International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference [ITBCC]). Tumor budding assessment using the ITBCC criteria has been validated in large cohorts of cancer patients and incorporated into several international colorectal cancer pathology and clinical guidelines. With the wider reporting of tumor budding, new issues have emerged that require further clarification. To better inform researchers and health-care professionals on these issues, an international group of experts in gastrointestinal pathology participated in a modified Delphi process to generate consensus and highlight areas requiring further research. This effort serves to re-affirm the importance of tumor budding in colorectal cancer and support its continued use in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cell MovementBiopsyCarcinomaCell DifferentiationColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPathology, ClinicalPredictive Value of TestsColorectal cancerDelphi studyITBCCTumor budding

Identifiers

PMID33650042
PMCPMC8448718
OpenAlexW3135676403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.