Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33650002›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Improving vision for surgeons during laparoscopy: the Enhanced Laparoscopic Vision System (ELViS).

Bertrand Trilling, Adrian Mancini, Gaëlle Fiard, Pierre Alain Barraud, Marion Decrouez, Sinara Vijayan, Mathias Tummers, Jean Luc Faucheron, Sophie Silvent, Christel Schwartz and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Poor usability of computer-assisted navigation for hip fracture surgery.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bertrand TrillingTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France. Btrilling@chu-grenoble.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2403-462X
Adrian ManciniTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Gaëlle FiardTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Pierre Alain BarraudTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Marion DecrouezSurgiqual Institute, Meylan, France.
Sinara VijayanTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Mathias TummersTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Jean Luc FaucheronTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Sophie SilventClinical Investigation Center - Technological Innovation 1406 (CIC-IT), Grenoble University Hospital, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Grenoble, France.
Christel SchwartzClinical Investigation Center - Technological Innovation 1406 (CIC-IT), Grenoble University Hospital, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Grenoble, France.
Sandrine VorosTIMC-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble Alps University, National Centre for Scientific Research, Grenoble National Polytechnical Institute, Grenoble Alps University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor many abdominal surgical interventions, laparotomy has gradually been replaced by laparoscopy, with numerous benefits for the patient in terms of post-operative recovery. However, during laparoscopy, the endoscope only provides a single viewpoint to the surgeon, leaving numerous blind spots and opening the way to peri-operative adverse events. Alternative camera systems have been proposed, but many lack the requisite resolution/robustness for use during surgery or cannot provide real-time images. Here, we present the added value of the Enhanced Laparoscopic Vision System (ELViS) which overcomes these limitations and provides a broad view of the surgical field in addition to the usual high-resolution endoscope.

methodsExperienced laparoscopy surgeons performed several typical procedure steps on a live pig model. The time-to-completion for surgical exercises performed by conventional endoscopy and ELViS-assisted surgery was measured. A debriefing interview following each operating session was conducted by an ergonomist, and a System Usability Scale (SUS) score was determined.

resultsProof of concept of ELVIS was achieved in an animal model with seven expert surgeons without peroperative adverse events related to the surgical device. No differences were found in time-to-completion. Mean SUS score was 74.7, classifying the usability of the ELViS as "good". During the debriefing interview, surgeons highlighted several situations where the ELViS provided a real advantage (such as during instrument insertion, exploration of the abdominal cavity or for orientation during close work) and also suggested avenues for improvement of the system.

conclusionsThis first test of the ELViS prototype on a live animal model demonstrated its usability and provided promising and useful feedback for further development.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndoscopesEquipment DesignLaparoscopyProof of Concept StudySurgeonsSwineAnimal modelDistributed laparoscopyEnhanced visualisationPhase 0 medical device evaluationTrocar prototype

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.