Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649993›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Factors influencing the sinus membrane thickness in edentulous regions: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Motohiro Munakata, Kikue Yamaguchi, Daisuke Sato, Naoko Yajima, Noriko Tachikawa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Relationships Between Radiomorphometric Parameters of the Maxillary Sinus and Development of Sinusitis: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Motohiro MunakataDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1, Kita-Senzoku, Ota-ku, 145-8515, Tokyo, Japan. munakata@kdu.ac.jp.
Kikue YamaguchiDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1, Kita-Senzoku, Ota-ku, 145-8515, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke SatoDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1, Kita-Senzoku, Ota-ku, 145-8515, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoko YajimaDepartment of Implant Dentistry, Showa University School of Dentistry, 2-1-1, Kita-Senzoku, Ota-ku, 145-8515, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko TachikawaTokyo Medical and Dental University Dental Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Showa University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring implant treatment in the maxillary molar area, maxillary sinus floor augmentation is often performed to ameliorate the reduced alveolar bone height attributable to bone remodeling and pneumatization-induced expansion of the maxillary sinus. However, this augmentation may cause complications such as misplaced implants, artery damage, and maxillary sinus mucosal perforation; infections like maxillary sinusitis; and postsurgical complications such as bone graft leakage and postoperative nasal hemorrhaging. To reduce the complications during maxillary sinus floor augmentation and postoperative infections, we performed retrospective investigations of various systemic and local factors that influence pre-operative sinus mucosal thickness (SMT) by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Subjects included patients who underwent maxillary sinus floor augmentation in an edentulous maxillary molar area with a lateral approach. Pre-operative SMT, existing bone mass, and nasal septum deviation were measured using CBCT images. Relationships between SMT and the following influencing factors were investigated: (1) age, (2) sex, (3) systemic disease, (4) smoking, (5) period after tooth extraction, (6) reason for tooth extraction, (7) residual alveolar bone height (RBH), (8) sinus septa, and (9) nasal septum deviation. Correlations were also investigated for age and RBH (p < 0.05).

resultsWe assessed 35 patients (40 sinuses; 11 male, 24 female). The average patient age was 58.90 ± 9.0 years (males, 57.9 ± 7.7 years; females, 59.9 ± 9.4 years; age range, 41-79 years). The average SMT was 1.09 ± 1.30 mm, incidence of SMT > 2 mm was 25.0%, incidence of SMT < 0.8 mm was 50.0%, and the average RBH was 2.14 ± 1.02 mm. The factors that influenced SMT included sex (p = 0.0078), period after tooth extraction (p = 0.0075), reason for tooth extraction (p = 0.020), sinus septa (p = 0.0076), and nasal septum deviation (p = 0.038).

conclusionsFactors associated with higher SMT included male sex, interval following tooth extraction < 6 months, periapical lesions, sinus septa, and nasal septum deviation. Factors associated with SMT > 2 mm were sex and reason for tooth extraction, while factors associated with SMT < 0.8 mm were time following tooth extraction and nasal septum deviation. Despite the limitations of this study, these preoperative evaluations may be of utmost importance for safely conducting maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

Indexed as

Mouth, EdentulousSinus Floor AugmentationAdultAgedCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMaxillary SinusMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesNasal septum deviationPeriapical lesionsSinus augmentationSinus mucosal thicknessTime following tooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID33649993
PMCPMC7921232
OpenAlexW3135280207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.