Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649956›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

A Resource for Cloning and Expression Vectors Designed for Bifidobacteria: Overview of Available Tools and Biotechnological Applications.

Lorena Ruiz, Maria Esteban-Torres, Douwe van Sinderen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Occurrence and applications of CRISPR-Cas systems in bifidobacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorena RuizDepartment of Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias, IPLA-CSIC, Villaviciosa, Spain. lorena.ruiz@ipla.csic.es.
Maria Esteban-TorresSchool of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Ireland University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Douwe van SinderenSchool of Microbiology and APC Microbiome Ireland University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bifidobacteria represent an important group of (mostly) commensal microorganisms, which have enjoyed increasing scientific and industrial attention due to their purported health-promoting attributes. For the latter reason, several species have been granted "generally recognized as safe" (GRAS) and "qualified presumption of safety" (QPS) status by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) organizations. Increasing scientific evidence supports their potential as oral delivery vectors to produce bioactive and therapeutic molecules at intestinal level. In order to achieve an efficient utilization of bifidobacterial strains as health-promoting (food) ingredients, it is necessary to provide evidence on the molecular mechanisms behind their purported beneficial and probiotic traits, and precise mechanisms of interaction with their human (or other mammalian) host. In this context, developing appropriate molecular tools to generate and investigate recombinant strains is necessary. While bifidobacteria have long remained recalcitrant to genetic manipulation, a wide array of Bifidobacterium-specific replicating vectors and genetic modification procedures have been described in literature. The current chapter intends to provide an updated overview on the vectors used to genetically modify and manipulate bifidobacteria, including their general characteristics, reviewing examples of their use to successfully generate recombinant bifidobacterial strains for specific purposes, and providing a general workflow and cautions to design and conduct heterologous expression in bifidobacteria. Knowledge gaps and fields of research that may help to widen the molecular toolbox to improve the functional and technological potential of bifidobacteria are also discussed.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumCloning, MolecularGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsIndustrial MicrobiologyPlasmidsWorkflowCloning vectorsHeterologous expressionLabeling bifidobacteria

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.