Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649951›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Detection, Isolation, and Purification of Bifidobacterial Exopolysaccharides.

Patricia Ruas-Madiedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patricia Ruas-MadiedoMicroHealth Group, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPLA-CSIC), Asturias, Spain. ruas-madiedo@ipla.csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter describes some of the available methods to assess EPS production in bifidobacteria, being largely based on those developed for the same purpose for members of the lactic acid bacteria group. The first step is detection of putative EPS-producing bifidobacteria based on a mucoid and/or ropy phenotype. Next, a basic procedure is described for the isolation of the glycan polymer based on the release from bifidobacterial cells grown and collected from the surface of agar-MRSc ("crude EPS"), followed by a purification procedure intended to remove other bacterial macromolecules (DNA and proteinaceous material) to generate "purified EPS." Finally, several methods used for quantification and physical-chemical characterization of isolated/purified polysaccharide are outlined.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumCell Culture TechniquesCentrifugationChemical PrecipitationDialysisFreeze DryingPolysaccharidesPolysaccharides, BacterialPolysaccharidesPolysaccharides, BacterialBifidobacteriumEPSExopolysaccharideIsolationMucoid phenotypePurificationRopy phenotype

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.