Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649947›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Bifidobacterium Strains.

Kieran James, Douwe van Sinderen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kieran JamesAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Douwe van SinderenSchool of Microbiology & APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. d.vansinderen@ucc.ie.
APC Microbiome Institute · IEUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, only a limited number of Bifidobacterium species are amenable to genetic manipulation using mutagenesis. This lack of genetic accessibility among the majority of bifidobacterial strains represents a significant roadblock for the study of gene function and expression in these potential probiotics. Genetic tools for generating mutants are difficult to develop for bifidobacteria, as they require workarounds for obstacles such as low transformation efficiencies, and the presence of differing and sometimes multiple restriction modification systems, in different strains. Site-directed mutagenesis is a frequently applied molecular strategy for the generation of targeted mutations, resulting in gene deletion or disruption, or alteration of their expression, thereby revealing information regarding their function. This strategy has been employed as a molecular tool in some Bifidobacterium strains and is typically achieved using a nonreplicating vector, harboring a DNA fragment corresponding to an internal part of the gene to be mutated. This vector is introduced into a bifidobacterial cell of the strain in question by electroporation. Through homologous recombination, this vector is integrated into the genomic DNA of said cell, disrupting the coding region of the targeted gene, thus preventing the expression of a functional protein product. Such mutant versions of Bifidobacterium strains may then be assessed for alterations in their phenotype or gene expression.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumCloning, MolecularEscherichia coliGenetic VectorsHomologous RecombinationMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationPlasmidsFunctional gene analysisHomologous recombinationMolecular cloningMutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID33649947
OpenAlexW3134235722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.