Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649898›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2021

In Vitro Anti-staphylococcal and Anti-inflammatory Abilities of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus from Infant Gut Microbiota as Potential Probiotic Against Infectious Women Mastitis.

Leila Bousmaha-Marroki, Denise Boutillier, Ahmed Marroki, Corinne Grangette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The preventive effect of probioticFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leila Bousmaha-MarrokiDepartment of Biology Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences , Djillali Liabes University , Sidi Bel Abbès, Algeria. l22_bousmaha@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5756-0971
Denise BoutillierUniversité de Lille, CNRS-Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR 9017 CIIL- Centre d'Immunité et d'Infection de Lille, Lille, France.
Ahmed MarrokiDepartment of Biology Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences , Djillali Liabes University , Sidi Bel Abbès, Algeria.
Corinne GrangetteUniversité de Lille, CNRS-Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR 9017 CIIL- Centre d'Immunité et d'Infection de Lille, Lille, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Djilali de Sidi Bel Abbès · DZUniversité Oran 1 Ahmed Ben Bella · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious mastitis is the major cause of early weaning, depriving infants of breastfeeding benefits. It is associated with an inflammatory condition of the breast and lowered resistance to infection. Drug administration during lactation often being contra-indicated, it is therefore important to consider safe therapeutic alternatives to antibiotic and anti-inflammatory therapies, such as probiotics. In this study, we investigated in vitro the probiotic potential of thirteen Lacticaseibacillus (formerly Lactobacillus) rhamnosus strains isolated from the gut microbiota of breastfed healthy infants. Strains were assessed for their β-hemolytic activity, their resistance to antibiotics, and their antimicrobial activities against strains of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus, most often involved in women mastitis. Their immunomodulating abilities were also studied using in vitro stimulation of human immune cells. None of the strains exhibited β-hemolytic activity, and all of them were sensitive to ampicillin, penicillin, tetracycline, rifampicin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, and imipenem but showed resistance to ceftazidime, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin, and cefotaxime, reported to be chromosomally encoded and not inducible or transferable. Four L. rhamnosus strains were selected for their large anti-staphylococcal spectrum: L. rhamnosus VR1-5 and L. rhamnosus VR3-1 inhibiting S. aureus, S. epidermis, and S. warneri and L. rhamnosus CB9-2 and L. rhamnosus CB10-5 exerting antagonistic effect against S. aureus and S. epidermis strains. Antimicrobial compounds released in cell-free supernatant showed proteinaceous nature and were thermoresistant. The immune modulatory analysis of the L. rhamnosus strains revealed two strains with significant anti-inflammatory potential, highlighted by strong induction of IL-10 and a weak pro-Th1 cytokine secretion (IL-12 and IFN-γ). L. rhamnosus CB9-2 combined a large anti-staphylococcal activity spectrum and a promising anti-inflammatory profile. This strain, used individually or in a mixture, can be considered as a probiotic candidate for the management of infectious mastitis during lactation.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusMastitisProbioticsFemaleHumansInfantStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus epidermidisAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntibacterial activityAnti-inflammatory abilityInfant gut microbiotaInfectious mastitisLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID33649898
OpenAlexW3133760038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.