Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649875›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2021

A quasi-equilibrium reduced model of pancreatic insulin secretion.

Alessandro Borri, Andrea De Gaetano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro BorriCNR-IASI Biomathematics Laboratory (BioMatLab), Rome, Italy. alessandro.borri@biomatematica.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6678-048X
Andrea De GaetanoCNR-IASI Biomathematics Laboratory (BioMatLab), Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much attention has been devoted in the last few decades to mathematical models of insulin secretion, in order to better understand the regulation of glycemia and its derangements. The glucose-insulin homeostatic mechanism is so complex and gives rise to such diverse behavior following perturbations that different models had been published, which reproduced the results of single experiments. More recently, a unifying model of pancreatic insulin secretion was proposed, which is able to account, with a single value of the (meta)parameters, for the wide array of clinically observed behavior. This model explicitly represented the pulsatile nature of the many pancreatic hormone-secreting firing units: the price to pay for its flexibility and performance is the very high dimensionality (hundreds of thousand equations) of the corresponding dynamical system. Clearly, it would be desirable to reduce this model to a much simpler form while retaining its power to reproduce heterogeneous phenomena. The present work reviews the qualitative behavior of this pancreas pulsatile model and offers some insight into its reduction in equilibrium and quasi-equilibrium conditions, also considering single-shot (non-repeated) glucose jumps from an approximately resting condition (such as would occur in standard Intra-Venous bolus dosing of glucose during diabetes diagnostic maneuvers). The resulting quasi-steady-state model can be further endowed with additional lower-order dynamics to also approximate transient behavior. Although a more accurate reduction of the original pulsatile model is left to further investigation, numerical results confirm the biomedical applicability of the formulation already obtained.

Indexed as

Insulin SecretionModels, BiologicalPancreasGlucoseHumansInsulinGlucoseInsulinDynamical SystemsGlycemiaInsulin SecretionPancreasPhysiological modelsQualitative behavior

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.