ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2020
Developing Personalized Models of Blood Pressure Estimation from Wearable Sensors Data Using Minimally-trained Domain Adversarial Neural Networks.
Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming Hypertension Diagnosis and Management in The Era of Artificial Intelligence: A 2023 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Workshop Report.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Review
- Development of a Personalized Multiclass Classification Model to Detect Blood Pressure Variations Associated with Physical or Cognitive Workload.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Deep Learning Framework for Deriving Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Waveforms from Transcranial Doppler.Annals of neurology · 2023Article
- Deep-learning-based blood pressure estimation using multi channel photoplethysmogram and finger pressure with attention mechanism.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Survey and Evaluation of Hypertension Machine Learning Research.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Trends in Passive IoT Biomarker Monitoring and Machine Learning for Cardiovascular Disease Management in the U.S. Elderly Population.Advances in geriatric medicine and research · 2023Article
- Assessment of Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Prediction from PPG and rPPG Signals Using Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Blood Pressure Monitoring System Using a Two-Channel Ballistocardiogram and Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood pressure monitoring is an essential component of hypertension management and in the prediction of associated comorbidities. Blood pressure is a dynamic vital sign with frequent changes throughout a given day. Capturing blood pressure remotely and frequently (also known as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) has traditionally been achieved by measuring blood pressure at discrete intervals using an inflatable cuff. However, there is growing interest in developing a cuffless ambulatory blood pressure monitoring system to measure blood pressure continuously. One such approach is by utilizing bioimpedance sensors to build regression models. A practical problem with this approach is that the amount of data required to confidently train such a regression model can be prohibitive. In this paper, we propose the application of the domain-adversarial training neural network (DANN) method on our multitask learning (MTL) blood pressure estimation model, allowing for knowledge transfer between subjects. Our proposed model obtains average root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.80 ± 0.74 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure and 7.34 ± 1.88 mmHg for systolic blood pressure when using three minutes of training data, 4.64 ± 0.60 mmHg and 7.10 ± 1.79 respectively when using four minutes of training data, and 4.48±0.57 mmHg and 6.79±1.70 respectively when using five minutes of training data. DANN improves training with minimal data in comparison to both directly training and to training with a pretrained model from another subject, decreasing RMSE by 0.19 to 0.26 mmHg (diastolic) and by 0.46 to 0.67 mmHg (systolic) in comparison to the best baseline models. We observe that four minutes of training data is the minimum requirement for our framework to exceed ISO standards within this cohort of patients.
Identifiers
33649743PMC7916101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.