Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649743›Full record

ArticleProceedings of machine learning research2020

Developing Personalized Models of Blood Pressure Estimation from Wearable Sensors Data Using Minimally-trained Domain Adversarial Neural Networks.

Lida Zhang, Nathan C Hurley, Bassem Ibrahim, Erica Spatz, Harlan M Krumholz, Roozbeh Jafari, Bobak J Mortazavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of machine learning research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Survey and Evaluation of Hypertension Machine Learning Research.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lida ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA.
Nathan C HurleyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA.
Bassem IbrahimDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA.
Erica SpatzYale School of Medicine, Yale University, USA.
Harlan M KrumholzYale School of Medicine, Yale University, USA.
Roozbeh JafariDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA.
Bobak J MortazaviDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
SCH: INT: A Context-aware Cuff-less Wearable Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor using a Bio-Impedance Sensor ArrayR01EB028106 · NIBIB · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI JAFARI, ROOZBEH · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure monitoring is an essential component of hypertension management and in the prediction of associated comorbidities. Blood pressure is a dynamic vital sign with frequent changes throughout a given day. Capturing blood pressure remotely and frequently (also known as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring) has traditionally been achieved by measuring blood pressure at discrete intervals using an inflatable cuff. However, there is growing interest in developing a cuffless ambulatory blood pressure monitoring system to measure blood pressure continuously. One such approach is by utilizing bioimpedance sensors to build regression models. A practical problem with this approach is that the amount of data required to confidently train such a regression model can be prohibitive. In this paper, we propose the application of the domain-adversarial training neural network (DANN) method on our multitask learning (MTL) blood pressure estimation model, allowing for knowledge transfer between subjects. Our proposed model obtains average root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.80 ± 0.74 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure and 7.34 ± 1.88 mmHg for systolic blood pressure when using three minutes of training data, 4.64 ± 0.60 mmHg and 7.10 ± 1.79 respectively when using four minutes of training data, and 4.48±0.57 mmHg and 6.79±1.70 respectively when using five minutes of training data. DANN improves training with minimal data in comparison to both directly training and to training with a pretrained model from another subject, decreasing RMSE by 0.19 to 0.26 mmHg (diastolic) and by 0.46 to 0.67 mmHg (systolic) in comparison to the best baseline models. We observe that four minutes of training data is the minimum requirement for our framework to exceed ISO standards within this cohort of patients.

Identifiers

PMID33649743
PMCPMC7916101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.