Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649691›Full record

ArticleClinical social work journal2021

A Pilot Study of Peer-to-Peer SBIRT Simulation as a Clinical Telehealth Training Tool During COVID-19.

Micki Washburn, Shu Zhou, McClain Sampson, Ashley Palmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical social work journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Micki WashburnUniversity of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1486-2501
Shu ZhouUniversity of Houston Graduate College of Social Work, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9138-477X
McClain SampsonCenter for Latina Maternal and Family Health, University of Houston Graduate College of Social Work, Houston, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3497-8878
Ashley PalmerUniversity of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0007-5945
The University of Texas at Arlington · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), is an evidence-based approach to screening and early intervention for those at risk of substance use disorders. With the ongoing health concerns related to COVID-19, there is an increased need for social workers who can competently deliver evidence-based interventions, such as SBIRT, via telehealth. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, traditional SBIRT training approaches using face-to-face (FTF) instruction and FTF simulated practice may not be a safe or feasible way to develop students' SBIRT- related skills. This study explores 35 social work graduate students' experiences of learning SBIRT skills in a remote learning format and subsequently delivering a SBIRT intervention to a live "client" via a peer-to-peer simulated telehealth session. Overall, students reported that the shift from FTF to remote learning made learning SBIRT skills difficult, and that providing brief intervention and referral was the most difficult step of the simulated SBIRT telehealth intervention. Qualitative feedback indicates that overall, students found the simulated telehealth sessions a valuable learning experience, but also reported that richer educational experiences would have resulted from additional practice opportunities and real time feedback. Implications for future research, simulation-based education and clinical practice are discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Online learningSBIRTSimulationTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID33649691
PMCPMC7904511
OpenAlexW3132960505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.