Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649579›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2021

Taking an antiracist posture in scientific publications in human genetics and genomics.

Kyle B Brothers, Robin L Bennett, Mildred K Cho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effectiveness of theCirculation · 2023
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Genomic Medicine: Considerations for Addressing Health Equity.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025
    Article
  9. A data model for population descriptors in genomic research.American journal of human genetics · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Open Science Practices in Psychiatric Genetics: A Primer.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. "Extremely slow and capricious": A qualitative exploration of genetic researcher priorities in selecting shared data resources.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle B BrothersDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA. kyle.brothers@louisville.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8550-9724
Robin L BennettDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mildred K ChoCenter for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From its earliest days, the field of human genetics has had a complex, and at times troubling, connection with racist ideologies. Although the modern field of human genetics and genomics has come a long way from those earlier errors, systemic racism remains ingrained in its institutions and practices. Although a variety of efforts are needed to excise systemic racism, we focus in this commentary on the work that must be done in scientific publishing in genetics and genomics. We propose eight principles that are both scientifically grounded and antiracist that we hope will serve as a foundation for the development of policies by publishers and editorial boards that address the unique needs of the field of genetics and genomics. Publishers and journals must go beyond mere policies, however. Editors and reviewers will need training on these policies and principles, and will benefit from resources like rubrics that can be used for evaluating the adherence of submissions to these guidelines.

Indexed as

Editorial PoliciesPublicationsGenomicsHuman GeneticsHumansPosture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.