Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Deep learning approaches for challenging species and gender identification of mosquito vectors.

Veerayuth Kittichai, Theerakamol Pengsakul, Kemmapon Chumchuen, Yudthana Samung, Patchara Sriwichai, Natthaphop Phatthamolrat, Teerawat Tongloy, Komgrit Jaksukam, Santhad Chuwongin, Siridech Boonsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Veerayuth KittichaiFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 1 chalongkrug road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Theerakamol PengsakulFaculty of Medical Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Kemmapon ChumchuenEpidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Yudthana SamungFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patchara SriwichaiFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthaphop PhatthamolratCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 1 chalongkrug road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teerawat TongloyCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 1 chalongkrug road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Komgrit JaksukamCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 1 chalongkrug road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Santhad ChuwonginCollege of Advanced Manufacturing Innovation, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 1 chalongkrug road, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siridech BoonsangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, 1 chalongkrug road, Bangkok, Thailand. Siridech.bo@kmitl.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic observation of mosquito species, which is the basis of morphological identification, is a time-consuming and challenging process, particularly owing to the different skills and experience of public health personnel. We present deep learning models based on the well-known you-only-look-once (YOLO) algorithm. This model can be used to simultaneously classify and localize the images to identify the species of the gender of field-caught mosquitoes. The results indicated that the concatenated two YOLO v3 model exhibited the optimal performance in identifying the mosquitoes, as the mosquitoes were relatively small objects compared with the large proportional environment image. The robustness testing of the proposed model yielded a mean average precision and sensitivity of 99% and 92.4%, respectively. The model exhibited high performance in terms of the specificity and accuracy, with an extremely low rate of misclassification. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.958 ± 0.011, which further demonstrated the model accuracy. Thirteen classes were detected with an accuracy of 100% based on a confusion matrix. Nevertheless, the relatively low detection rates for the two species were likely a result of the limited number of wild-caught biological samples available. The proposed model can help establish the population densities of mosquito vectors in remote areas to predict disease outbreaks in advance.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnimalsCulicidaeFemaleMaleMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID33649429
PMCPMC7921658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.