Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649424›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Marine cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima as an alternate to the animal cell culture medium supplement.

Younsik Jeong, Woon-Yong Choi, Areumi Park, Yeon-Ji Lee, Youngdeuk Lee, Gun-Hoo Park, Su-Jin Lee, Won-Kyu Lee, Yong-Kyun Ryu, Do-Hyung Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The potential ofRegenerative therapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Eco-friendlyHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  11. Serum-Free Medium Supplemented withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Younsik JeongJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Woon-Yong ChoiJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Areumi ParkJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Yeon-Ji LeeJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Youngdeuk LeeJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Gun-Hoo ParkJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Su-Jin LeeJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Won-Kyu LeeJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Kyun RyuJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea.
Do-Hyung KangJeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST), Jeju, Republic of Korea. dohkang@kiost.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serum is a stable medium supplement for in vitro cell culture. Live cells are used in stem cell research, drug toxicity and safety testing, disease diagnosis and prevention, and development of antibiotics, drugs, and vaccines. However, use of serum in culture involves concerns such as an ethical debate regarding the collection process, lack of standardized ingredients, and high cost. Herein, therefore, we evaluated the possibility of using edible cyanobacterium (Spirulina maxima), which is a nutrient-rich, sustainable, and ethically acceptable source, as a novel substitute for fetal bovine serum (FBS). H460 cells were cultured to the 10th generation by adding a mixture of spirulina animal cell culture solution (SACCS) and FBS to the culture medium. Cell morphology and viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, proteomes, and transcriptomes were assessed. We observed that SACCS had better growth-promoting capabilities than FBS. Cell proliferation was promoted even when FBS was replaced by 50-70% SACCS; there was no significant difference in cell shape or viability. There were only slight differences in the cell cycle, apoptosis, proteomes, and transcriptomes of the cells grown in presence of SACCS. Therefore, SACCS has the potential to be an effective, low-cost, and eco-friendly alternative to FBS in in vitro culture.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCulture MediaHumansSpirulinaCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID33649424
PMCPMC7921123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.