Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649060›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Is health literacy associated with antibiotic use, knowledge and awareness of antimicrobial resistance among non-medical university students in Egypt? A cross-sectional study.

Aya Mostafa, Abdurrahman Abdelzaher, Salma Rashed, Salma I AlKhawaga, Shadwa K Afifi, Shaimaa AbdelAlim, Shaimaa A Mostafa, Taha A Zidan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pattern of antibiotic use among children caregivers: a cross-sectional study.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aya MostafaDepartment of Community, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt aya.kamaleldin@med.asu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2803-2608
Abdurrahman AbdelzaherAin Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0721-4506
Salma RashedAin Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-4412
Salma I AlKhawagaAin Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-2381
Shadwa K AfifiAin Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-3766
Shaimaa AbdelAlimAin Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-4287
Shaimaa A MostafaAin Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1943-5453
Taha A ZidanAin Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5707-7285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAntibiotic resistance is a global public health concern, especially in developing countries, where antibiotic misuse is widespread. However, studies investigating relevant factors, particularly in youth, are limited. This study examined the levels of health literacy (HL) and their association with antibiotic use, knowledge of antibiotics and awareness of antibiotic resistance among university students in Egypt.

designA cross-sectional study was conducted using self-administered questionnaires during 2018. The Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU-Q16) and the WHO Antibiotic resistance: Multi-Country Public Awareness Survey were used. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to compare responses on use and knowledge of antibiotics, and awareness of antibiotic resistance between the three levels of students' HL.

settingUniversity, Cairo, Egypt.

participants508 non-medical university students. OUTCOMES: Students' HL scores were categorised into sufficient, problematic and inadequate. Students' knowledge of antibiotics was categorised into good and poor. Students' awareness of antibiotic resistance was categorised into high, average and poor.

results35.1% of students had sufficient HL. 79.7% of students had poor knowledge of antibiotics. 39.9% of students reported having used antibiotics in the past month without a prescription. 92.2% had limited awareness of antibiotic resistance and 30.6% of students heard about the term 'antimicrobial resistance'. Background characteristics did not significantly differ by HL levels or knowledge scores, except for students' year of study. Sufficient HL was independently associated with students' high awareness of antibiotic resistance (adjusted OR=2.8; 95% CI: 1.3 to 5.9).

conclusionsHL was insufficient in this sample of non-medical Egyptian university students. Across all levels of HL, knowledge of antibiotics and awareness of antibiotic resistance were limited, reflecting deficiency in relevant education programmes. Findings suggest that sufficient HL supports high awareness of antibiotic resistance. Incorporating HL and rational antibiotic use awareness raising programmes in university curricula is an urgent necessity to curb antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHealth LiteracyAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEgyptHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesAnti-Bacterial Agentspublic healththerapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33649060
PMCPMC8098941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.