Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33649055›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Parental assessment of disease severity in febrile children under 5 years of age: a qualitative study.

Dora L Kuijpers, Daphne Peeters, Nina C Boom, Josephine van de Maat, Rianne Oostenbrink, Gertjan J A Driessen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How patients in general practice voice and value their gut feelings about health: a qualitative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dora L KuijpersDepartment of Paediatrics, Juliana Children's Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Daphne PeetersDepartment of Paediatrics, Juliana Children's Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3110-9434
Nina C BoomDepartment of Paediatric Intensive Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Josephine van de MaatInfectious Diseases and Global Health, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7351-4596
Rianne OostenbrinkGeneral Paediatrics, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-8934
Gertjan J A DriessenDepartment of Paediatrics, Juliana Children's Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands gertjan.driessen@mumc.nl.
Juliana Kinderziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore how parents judge disease severity of their febrile child and to identify symptoms they associate with serious illness, minor illness or health.

designSemistructured interviews were conducted. Interviews were audio taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

participantsParents of children aged 0-5 years with a febrile illness.

settingParticipants were recruited at the paediatric ward and the emergency department.

resultsTwenty-six interviews were conducted, in which 37 parents participated. Parents described disease severity of their child mainly in terms of changes in their child's normal characteristics (behaviour and physical features). They found it harder to describe specific disease symptoms such as dyspnoea or dehydration. Their child being active, eating and drinking well, and smiling were perceived as reassuring, whereas high fever, moving very little and uncertainty about the type of infections were mentioned as alarming symptoms. Previous experience with febrile illnesses in their children was of great influence on the number and accuracy of symptoms they reported.

conclusionParents used the normal behaviour and physical features of their child as a reference frame for judging disease severity. With a larger deviation from the child's normal characteristics, parents considered the illness more serious. They were less able to describe specific symptoms of disease such as dyspnoea or dehydration. This knowledge is important for clinicians in their communication with parents of children with febrile illness.

Indexed as

FeverParentsChildChild, PreschoolCommunicationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornQualitative ResearchSeverity of Illness Indexpaediatric A&E and ambulatory carepaediatric infectious disease & immunisationpaediatricsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33649055
PMCPMC8098985
OpenAlexW3134621942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.