ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2021
A History of Cancer Research: Carcinogens and Mutagens.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic Alterations of Cancer Cells and Their Boost by Polyploidization: Unicellular Attractor (UCA) Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Pioneering contribution of Professor Bruce Ames to early development in biochemical aspects of oxidatively generated damage to DNA.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Mutation or not, what directly establishes a neoplastic state, namely cellular immortality and autonomy, still remains unknown and should be prioritized in our research.Journal of Cancer · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Observations of the incidence of tumors among chimney sweeps in the eighteenth century and later experiments with coal tars provided early evidence that carcinogens in the environment can promote cancer. Subsequent studies of individuals exposed to radiation, work on fly genetics, and the discovery that DNA was the genetic material led to the idea that these carcinogens act by inducing mutations in DNA that change the behavior of cells and ultimately cause cancer. In this excerpt from his forthcoming book, Joe Lipsick looks back at how the concepts of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis emerged, how these converged with development of the Ames test, and how biochemistry and crystallography ultimately revealed the underlying molecular basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.