ReviewInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2021
Imaging modalities in pregnant cancer patients.
Review in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancer During Pregnancy: Navigating Clinical and Research Challenges.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #76: Cancer in pregnancy.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Pilocytic Astrocytoma Causing Brainstem Compression in Pregnancy: Case Report with Literature Review.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Successful radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in a pregnant patient: a case report and literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Brain Tumors in Pregnancy: A Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Management, and Ethical Dilemmas.Cancers · 2025Review
- A profile of lung cancer in the young population with a highlight on the Indian perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Present and future of whole-body MRI in metastatic disease and myeloma: how and why you will do it.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Pregnant patient with Xp11.2/transcription factor E3 translocation renal cell carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Cancer and Pregnancy in the Post-Roe v. Wade Era: A Comprehensive Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Cervical cancer in the pregnant population.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Cancer in pregnancy: overview and epidemiology.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Ovarian cancer during pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Medicolegal considerations associated with cancer during pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Prognosis, counseling, and indications for termination of pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Melanoma in pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Bioethical issues in imaging cancer in pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Pushing the boundaries. Concurrent Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer treatment with preservation of pregnancy: A case report.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
- Cancer and Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer during pregnancy is increasingly diagnosed due to the trend of delaying pregnancy to a later age and probably also because of increased use of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy screening with incidental finding of maternal cancer. Pregnant women pose higher challenges in imaging, diagnosis, and staging of cancer. Physiological tissue changes related to pregnancy makes image interpretation more difficult. Moreover, uncertainty about the safety of imaging modalities, fear of (unnecessary) fetal radiation, and lack of standardized imaging protocols may result in underutilization of the necessary imaging tests resulting in suboptimal staging. Due to the absence of radiation exposure, ultrasound and MRI are obvious first-line imaging modalities for detailed locoregional disease assessment. MRI has the added advantage of a more reproducible comprehensive organ or body region assessment, the ability of distant staging through whole-body evaluation, and the combination of anatomical and functional information by diffusion-weighted imaging which obviates the need for a gadolinium-based contrast-agent. Imaging modalities with inherent radiation exposure such as CT and nuclear imaging should only be performed when the maternal benefit outweighs fetal risk. The cumulative radiation exposure should not exceed the fetal radiation threshold of 100 mGy. Imaging should only be performed when necessary for diagnosis and likely to guide or change management. Radiologists play an important role in the multidisciplinary team in order to select the most optimal imaging strategies that balance maternal benefit with fetal risk and that are most likely to guide treatment decisions. Our aim is to provide an overview of possibilities and concerns in current clinical applications and developments in the imaging of patients with cancer during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.