Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33648924›Full record

ArticleEuropean cytokine network2020

Extensive longitudinal immune profiling reveals sustained innate immune activation in COVID-19 patients with unfavorable outcome

Benjamin Schrijver, Jorn L J C Assmann, Adriaan J van Gammeren, Roel C H Vermeulen, Lützen Portengen, Peter Heukels, Anton W Langerak, Willem A Dik, Vincent H J van der Velden, Ton A A M Ermens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European cytokine network, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A cautionary note on altered pace of aging in the COVID-19 era.Forensic science international. Genetics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benjamin SchrijverDepartment of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jorn L J C AssmannDepartment of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Adriaan J van GammerenDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Roel C H VermeulenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Lützen PortengenDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter HeukelsDepartment of Pulmonology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Anton W LangerakDepartment of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Willem A DikDepartment of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Vincent H J van der VeldenDepartment of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ton A A M ErmensDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 differs substantially between individuals, ranging from mild to severe or even fatal. Heterogeneity in the immune response against SARS-COV-2 likely contributes to this. Therefore, we explored the temporal dynamics of key cellular and soluble mediators of innate and adaptive immune activation in relation to COVID-19 severity and progression. Forty-four patients with a PCR-proven diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. Extensive cellular (leukocytes and T-lymphocyte subsets) and serological immune profiling (cytokines, soluble cell surface molecules, and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies) was performed at hospital admission and every 3-4 days during hospitalization. Measurements and disease outcome were compared between patients with an unfavorable (IC admission and/or death) and favorable (all others) outcome. Patients with an unfavorable outcome had higher leukocyte numbers at baseline, mostly due to increased neutrophils, whereas lymphocyte and monocyte numbers were reduced. CRP, IL-6, CCL2, CXCL10, and GM-CSF levels were higher at baseline in the unfavorable group, whereas IL-7 levels were lower. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were more frequently absent in the unfavorable group. Longitudinal analysis revealed delayed kinetics of activated CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte subsets in the unfavorable group. Furthermore, whereas CRP, IL-6, CXCL10, and GM-CSF declined in the favorable group, these cytokines declined with delayed kinetics, remained increased, or even increased further in the unfavorable group. Our data indicate a state of increased innate immune activation in COVID19-patients with an unfavorable outcome at hospital admission, which remained over time, as compared with patients with a favorable outcome.

Indexed as

COVID-19Immunity, InnateAdultCytokinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexT-Lymphocyte SubsetsCytokinesCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33648924
PMCPMC7937051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.