Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33648623›Full record

SynthesisHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2021

Reduced exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension to reduce mortality in critically ill people aged 65 and over: the 65 RCT.

Paul R Mouncey, Alvin Richards-Belle, Karen Thomas, David A Harrison, M Zia Sadique, Richard D Grieve, Julie Camsooksai, Robert Darnell, Anthony C Gordon, Doreen Henry and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Permissive Hypotension in a Patient with Severe Hypernatremia: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. A Machine-Learning Approach for Estimating Subgroup- and Individual-Level Treatment Effects: An Illustration Using the 65 Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul R MounceyClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8510-8517
Alvin Richards-BelleClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-9380
Karen ThomasClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7548-4466
David A HarrisonClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9002-9098
M Zia SadiqueDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5814-0258
Richard D GrieveDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-1301
Julie CamsooksaiCritical Care, Research and Innovation, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1139-2252
Robert DarnellClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4490-1962
Anthony C GordonDivision of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0419-547X
Doreen HenryPatient representative, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2216-5589
Nicholas HudsonClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0127-421X
Alexina J MasonDivision of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7319-4545
Michelle SaullClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0558-0692
Chris WhitmanPatient representative, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-1147
J Duncan YoungKadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-4835
François LamontagneDepartment of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0360-3427
Kathryn M RowanClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-5602
65 trial investigators
Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBImperial College London · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBPoole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

Department of Health 15/80/39
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasopressors are administered to critical care patients to avoid hypotension, which is associated with myocardial injury, kidney injury and death. However, they work by causing vasoconstriction, which may reduce blood flow and cause other adverse effects. A mean arterial pressure target typically guides administration. An individual patient data meta-analysis (Lamontagne F, Day AG, Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Hylands M,

objectiveTo estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reduced vasopressor exposure through permissive hypotension (i.e. a lower mean arterial pressure target of 60-65 mmHg) in older critically ill patients.

designA pragmatic, randomised clinical trial with integrated economic evaluation.

settingSixty-five NHS adult general critical care units.

participantsCritically ill patients aged ≥ 65 years receiving vasopressors for vasodilatory hypotension.

interventionsIntervention - permissive hypotension (i.e. a mean arterial pressure target of 60-65 mmHg). Control (usual care) - a mean arterial pressure target at the treating clinician's discretion.

main outcome measuresThe primary clinical outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. The primary cost-effectiveness outcome was 90-day incremental net monetary benefit. Secondary outcomes included receipt and duration of advanced respiratory and renal support, mortality at critical care and acute hospital discharge, and questionnaire assessment of cognitive decline and health-related quality of life at 90 days and 1 year.

resultsOf 2600 patients randomised, 2463 (permissive hypotension, LIMITATIONS: The intervention was unblinded, with risk of bias minimised through central allocation concealment and a primary outcome not subject to observer bias. The control group event rate was higher than anticipated.

conclusionsIn critically ill patients aged ≥ 65 years receiving vasopressors for vasodilatory hypotension, permissive hypotension did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality compared with usual care. The absolute treatment effect on 90-day mortality, based on 95% confidence intervals, was between a 6.8-percentage reduction and a 1.1-percentage increase in mortality. FUTURE WORK: Future work should (1) update the individual patient data meta-analysis, (2) explore approaches for evaluating heterogeneity of treatment effect and (3) explore 65 trial conduct, including use of deferred consent, to inform future trials.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN10580502.

fundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHypotensionAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBLOOD PRESSURECLINICAL TRIALCRITICAL CAREINTENSIVE CAREMEAN ARTERIAL PRESSUREVASOPRESSORS

Identifiers

PMID33648623
PMCPMC7957458
OpenAlexW3133573859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.