Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33648535›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2021

Selinexor versus doxorubicin in dedifferentiated liposarcoma PDXs: evidence of greater activity and apoptotic response dependent on p53 nuclear accumulation and survivin down-regulation.

Valentina Zuco, Sandro Pasquali, Monica Tortoreto, Silvia Brich, Stefano Percio, Gian Paolo Dagrada, Chiara Colombo, Roberta Sanfilippo, Calogero Lauricella, Mrinal Gounder and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06680401 (The Evaluation of Cytokines and Hormones as Biomarkers for Epithelioid Haemangioendothelioma and Generation of Patient-derived Preclinical Models to Assess the Activity of Anticancer Agents and Validate Novel Therapeutic Targets), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06680401 recruitingnot on this map

The Evaluation of Cytokines and Hormones as Biomarkers for Epithelioid Haemangioendothelioma and Generation of Patient-derived Preclinical Models to Assess the Activity of Anticancer Agents and Validate Novel Therapeutic Targets

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2021 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsClinical Presentation, Natural History, Treatment Outcomes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Choosing the right animal model for sarcoma research.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GDF-15 Predicts Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Aggressiveness and Is Downregulated by Sirolimus through ATF4/ATF5 Suppression.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina Zuco *Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Sandro Pasquali *Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Monica TortoretoMolecular Pharmacology Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Silvia BrichDepartment of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Stefano PercioMolecular Pharmacology Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Gian Paolo DagradaDepartment of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ColomboSarcoma Service, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Roberta SanfilippoAdult Mesenchymal Tumor and Rare Cancer Unit, Department of Cancer Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Calogero LauricellaMolecular Pathology Unit, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Grande, Milan, Italy.
Mrinal GounderSarcoma Medical Oncology and Early Drug Development, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, 10065, New York, NY, USA.
Rihan El BezawyMolecular Pharmacology Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Marta BarisellaDepartment of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Angelo Paolo Dei TosDepartment of Medicine, University of Padua School of Medicine, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Paolo Giovanni CasaliAdult Mesenchymal Tumor and Rare Cancer Unit, Department of Cancer Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro GronchiSarcoma Service, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Silvia Stacchiotti *Adult Mesenchymal Tumor and Rare Cancer Unit, Department of Cancer Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Nadia Zaffaroni *Molecular Pharmacology Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Amadeo 42, 20133, Milan, Italy. nadia.zaffaroni@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Cancer Research UK 29363NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), a tumor that lacks effective treatment strategies and is associated with poor outcomes, expresses amplified MDM2 in the presence of wild-type p53. MDM2 ubiquitination of p53 facilitates its XPO1-mediated nuclear export, thus limiting p53 tumor suppressor functions. Consequently, nuclear export is a rational target in DDLPS. We directly compared the antitumor activity of the first-in class XPO1 inhibitor selinexor and doxorubicin, the standard front-line therapy in sarcomas, in DDLPS patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and primary cell lines.

methodsDrug activity was assessed in three PDXs (and two corresponding cell lines) established from the dedifferentiated component of primary untreated retroperitoneal DDLPS with myogenic (N = 2) and rhabdomyoblastic (N = 1) differentiation from patients who underwent surgery. These models were marked by amplification of MDM2, CDK4 and HMGA2 genes.

resultsSelinexor was moderately active in the three PDXs but achieved greater tumor response compared to doxorubicin (maximum tumor volume inhibition: 46-80 % vs. 37-60 %). The PDX harboring rhabdomyoblastic dedifferentiation showed the highest sensitivity to both agents. PDX response to selinexor and doxorubicin was not associated with the extent of MDM2 and CDK4 gene amplification. Interestingly, the most chemosensitive PDX model showed the lowest extent of HMGA2 amplification. Selinexor was also more efficient than doxorubicinin in inducing an apoptotic response in PDXs and cell lines. Consistently, an increased nuclear accumulation of p53 was seen in all selinexor-treated models. In addition, a time-dependent decrease of survivin expression, with an almost complete abrogation of the cytoplasmic anti-apoptotic pool of this protein, was observed as a consequence of the decreased acetylation/activation of STAT3 and the increased ubiquitination of nuclear survivin.

conclusionsSelinexor showed a moderate antitumor activity in three DDLPS PDXs, which was, however, consistently higher than doxorubicin across all different models regardless the extent of MDM2 amplification and the histological differentiation. The depletion of survivin protein seems to significantly contribute to the induction of apoptosis through which selinexor exerts its antitumor activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticApoptosisCell DedifferentiationCell NucleusDown-RegulationDoxorubicinHumansHydrazinesLiposarcomaMaleMiceMice, NudeRandom AllocationSurvivinTriazolesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBIRC5 protein, humanDoxorubicinHydrazinesselinexorSurvivinTP53 protein, humanTriazolesTumor Suppressor Protein p53Dedifferentiated liposarcomaDoxorubicinPDXPrimary cell cultureSelinexorSurvivinXPO1

Identifiers

PMID33648535
PMCPMC7923610
OpenAlexW3134956128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.