Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33648528›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2021

It's a woman's thing: gender roles sustaining the practice of female genital mutilation among the Kassena-Nankana of northern Ghana.

Patricia Akweongo, Elizabeth F Jackson, Shirley Appiah-Yeboah, Evelyn Sakeah, James F Phillips

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia AkweongoSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana. pakweongo@ug.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-3365
Elizabeth F JacksonHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Shirley Appiah-Yeboah, Benmore, P. O. Box 650698, Joahnnesburg, 2010, South Africa.
Evelyn SakeahNavrongo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Navrongo, Upper East Region, Ghana.
James F PhillipsHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USJones Institute · USNavrongo Health Research Centre · GHUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe practice of female genital mutilation (FGM/C) in traditional African societies is grounded in traditions of patriarchy that subjugate women. It is widely assumed that approaches to eradicating the practice must therefore focus on women's empowerment and changing gender roles.

methodsThis paper presents findings from a qualitative study of the FGM/C beliefs and opinions of men and women in Kassena-Nankana District of northern Ghana. Data are analyzed from 22 focus group panels of young women, young men, reproductive age women, and male social leaders.

resultsThe social systemic influences on FGM/C decision-making are complex. Men represent exogenous sources of social influence on FGM/C decisions through their gender roles in the patriarchal system. As such, their FGM/C decision influence is more prominent for uncircumcised brides at the time of marriage than for FGM/C decisions concerning unmarried adolescents. Women in extended family compounds are relatively prominent as immediate sources of influence on FGM/C decision-making for both brides and adolescents. Circumcised women are the main source of social support for the practice, which they exercise through peer pressure in concert with co-wives. Junior wives entering a polygynous marriage or a large extended family are particularly vulnerable to this pressure. Men are less influential and more open to suggestions of eliminating the practice of FGM/C than women.

conclusionFindings attest to the need for social research on ways to involve men in the promotion of FGM/C abandonment, building on their apparent openness to social change. Investigation is also needed on ways to marshal women's social networks for offsetting their extended family familial roles in sustaining FGM/C practices.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleDecision MakingGender RoleAdolescentAdultCultureFemaleFocus GroupsGenitalia, FemaleGhanaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMarriageQualitative ResearchReligionFemale genital cuttingFemale genital mutilationGender stratificationGhanaHarmful traditional practicesSahelian AfricaSocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID33648528
PMCPMC7923333
OpenAlexW3116218268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.