Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33647938›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Extracting postmarketing adverse events from safety reports in the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) using deep learning.

Jingcheng Du, Yang Xiang, Madhuri Sankaranarayanapillai, Meng Zhang, Jingqi Wang, Yuqi Si, Huy Anh Pham, Hua Xu, Yong Chen, Cui Tao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05455983 (Relationship Between Different Types of COVID-19 Vaccine and Development of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05455983 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Relationship Between Different Types of COVID-19 Vaccine and Development of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled500ConditionsCOVID-19 VaccineArmscovid19 vaccines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Large language models in biomedicine and health: current research landscape and future directions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  8. Improving large language models for clinical named entity recognition via prompt engineering.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Classifying Drug Ratings Using User Reviews with Transformer-Based Language Models.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jingcheng DuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-4566
Yang XiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-6805
Madhuri SankaranarayanapillaiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Meng ZhangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jingqi WangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yuqi SiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Huy Anh PhamSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4672
Yong ChenPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cui TaoSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Patient Medical History Representation, Extraction, and Inference from EHR DataR01LM011829 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAutomated analysis of vaccine postmarketing surveillance narrative reports is important to understand the progression of rare but severe vaccine adverse events (AEs). This study implemented and evaluated state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms for named entity recognition to extract nervous system disorder-related events from vaccine safety reports. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) related influenza vaccine safety reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 1990 to 2016. VAERS reports were selected and manually annotated with major entities related to nervous system disorders, including, investigation, nervous_AE, other_AE, procedure, social_circumstance, and temporal_expression. A variety of conventional machine learning and deep learning algorithms were then evaluated for the extraction of the above entities. We further pretrained domain-specific BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) using VAERS reports (VAERS BERT) and compared its performance with existing models. RESULTS AND

conclusionsNinety-one VAERS reports were annotated, resulting in 2512 entities. The corpus was made publicly available to promote community efforts on vaccine AEs identification. Deep learning-based methods (eg, bi-long short-term memory and BERT models) outperformed conventional machine learning-based methods (ie, conditional random fields with extensive features). The BioBERT large model achieved the highest exact match F-1 scores on nervous_AE, procedure, social_circumstance, and temporal_expression; while VAERS BERT large models achieved the highest exact match F-1 scores on investigation and other_AE. An ensemble of these 2 models achieved the highest exact match microaveraged F-1 score at 0.6802 and the second highest lenient match microaveraged F-1 score at 0.8078 among peer models.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGuillain-Barre SyndromeInfluenza VaccinesAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsComputer SystemsHumansUnited StatesInfluenza Vaccinesdeep learningnamed entity recognitionvaccine adverse eventsVAERS

Identifiers

PMID33647938
PMCPMC8279785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.