Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33647837›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology2021

Disentangling the obesity paradox in upper gastrointestinal cancers: Weight loss matters more than body mass index.

Shria Kumar, Nadim Mahmud, David S Goldberg, Jashodeep Datta, David E Kaplan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Common Risk Factors in Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Narrative Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Longitudinal Study of Comorbidities and Clinical Outcomes in Persons with Gallstone Disease Using Electronic Health Records.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shria KumarDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Nadim MahmudDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, United States.
David S GoldbergDivision of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, United States.
Jashodeep DattaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States.
David E KaplanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, United States; Gastroenterology Section, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States. Electronic address: dakaplan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Miami · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007740 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI James D Lewis · 1997 to 2026
$9.2M
Cross-comparison of patient-derived xenografts and derivative organoids and cell lines for translational research in hepatocellular carcinomaI01CX001933 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GADE, TERENCE P · 2020 to 2023
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001933NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe obesity paradox, whereby obesity appears to confer protection against cancer-related mortality, remains controversial. This has not yet been evaluated in upper gastrointestinal cancers. DESIGNS: We identified esophageal, cardia, and non-cardia gastric adenocarcinomas in the Veterans Health Administration between 2006-2016. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models evaluate the impact of BMI at- and prior to- cancer diagnosis on mortality, adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics, weight loss, and clinical stage (early: T1B/2N0; locally advanced: ≥T2N+).

resultsWe identify 1308 patients: 99 % male, median 66 years. In early disease, relative to BMI 30, BMI 18 and 20 at diagnosis had increased risk of death (HR 1.83, 95 %CI: 1.38-2.44 and HR 1.50, 95 %CI: 1.20-1.87, respectively, p < 0.0001). Patients with BMI > 30 did not. In locally advanced disease, at diagnosis BMI 18 (HR 1.58, 95 %CI: 1.0001-1.48, p = 0.05), BMI 20 (HR 1.46, 95 %CI: 1.01-2.09, p = 0.04), and BMI 25 (HR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.04-1.38, p = 0.01) had increased risk of death, but BMI > 30 did not. In models assessing premorbid BMI and weight loss, increasing amounts of weight loss were associated with mortality independent of BMI in early cancers. For locally advanced cancers, without weight loss, there was no association with death, regardless of BMI.

conclusionThe predominant driver of mortality across clinical stages is weight loss. The obesity paradox appears to exist in early stage disease only. Future studies should investigate mechanisms for the obesity paradox, accompanying physiologic changes with weight loss preceding diagnosis, and if patients with low BMI and weight loss benefit from early nutritional support.

Indexed as

AgedBody Mass IndexFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesWeight LossCardia adenocarcinomaEsophageal cancerGastric cancerObesity paradox

Identifiers

PMID33647837
PMCPMC8141012
OpenAlexW3133839902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.