ArticlePsychiatry research2021
Multifactorial prediction of depression diagnosis and symptom dimensions.
Article in Psychiatry research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Actigraphically measured psychomotor slowing in depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Network analysis of eating disorders (NAMED): an exploratory study of symptom configuration at different stages of illness.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Parental relationship satisfaction, symptoms of depression and anger/hostility, and the moderating role of perceived social support-a prospective cohort study in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- HMGB1 in depression: An overview of microglial HMBG1 in the pathogenesis of depression.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2023Review
- Associating broad and clinically defined polygenic scores for depression with depression-related phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The development and internal evaluation of a predictive model to identify for whom Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) offers superior relapse prevention for recurrent depression versus maintenance antidepressant medication.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Whole Person Modeling: a transdisciplinary approach to mental health research.Discover mental health · 2023Review
- A narrative review of digital biomarkers in the management of major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant forms.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While depression is a leading cause of disability, prior investigations of depression have been limited by studying correlates in isolation. A data-driven approach was applied to identify out-of-sample predictors of current depression from adults (N = 217) sampled on a continuum of no depression to clinical levels. The current study used elastic net regularized regression and predictors from sociodemographic, self-report, polygenic scores, resting electroencephalography, pupillometry, actigraphy, and cognitive tasks to classify individuals into currently depressed (MDE), psychiatric control (PC), and no current psychopathology (NP) groups, as well as predicting symptom severity and lifetime MDE. Cross-validated models explained 20.6% of the out-of-fold deviance for the classification of MDEs versus PC, 33.2% of the deviance for MDE versus NP, but -0.6% of the deviance between PC and NP. Additionally, predictors accounted for 25.7% of the out-of-fold variance in anhedonia severity, 65.7% of the variance in depression severity, and 12.9% of the deviance in lifetime depression (yes/no). Self-referent processing, anhedonia, and psychosocial functioning emerged as important differentiators of MDE and PC groups. Findings highlight the advantages of using psychiatric control groups to isolate factors specific to depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.