Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33647590›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2021

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare access among patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder.

Brendan P Jacka, Tim Janssen, Bryan R Garner, Julia Yermash, Kimberly R Yap, Elizabeth L Ball, Bryan Hartzler, Sara J Becker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brendan P JackaDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Tim JanssenCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health Providence, RI, USA.
Bryan R GarnerResearch Triangle International: RTI, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Julia YermashCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health Providence, RI, USA.
Kimberly R YapCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health Providence, RI, USA.
Elizabeth L BallResearch Triangle International: RTI, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Bryan HartzlerAlcohol & Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sara J BeckerCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: sara_becker@brown.edu.
Brown University · USRTI International · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Implementing contingency management in opioid treatment centers across New England: A hybrid type 3 trialR01DA046941 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BECKER, SARA, GARNER, BRYAN R · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
Informing treatment adaptation based on the interplay between behavioral undercontrol and context: an event-level studyK01AA026335 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JANSSEN, TIM · 2018 to 2022
$904k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA026335NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered treatment delivery for opioid treatment programs (OTPs) dispensing medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). We aimed to identify patterns of substance use among MOUD patients and examine whether COVID-19-related impacts on access to healthcare varied across subgroups.

methodsThis analysis was embedded within a type 3 hybrid trial that enrolled patients across eight OTPs at the start of the pandemic. Enrolled patients reported on past-30 day use of multiple substances during their baseline assessment. Participants re-contacted in May-July 2020 completed a survey about COVID-19-related impacts on various life domains. Using latent class analysis we identified patient subgroups, and then examined group differences on a set of negative and positive COVID-19 impacts related to healthcare access.

resultsOf the 188 trial participants, 135 (72 %) completed the survey. Latent class analysis identified three MOUD patient subgroups: minimal use (class probability: 0.25); opioid use (class probability: 0.34); and polysubstance use (class probability: 0.41). Compared to the minimal use group, the polysubstance use group reported increased substance use and difficulty accessing sterile needles, naloxone, and preferred substance. The opioid use group reported increased substance use and difficulty accessing their preferred substance. There were no significant group differences related to accessing routine or specialized healthcare or medication; or paying attention to their health.

conclusionsDuring COVID-19, many MOUD patients reported challenges accessing care, particularly harm reduction services for patients with polysubstance use. Additional efforts, like providing wraparound support, may be necessary to serve the needs of MOUD patients.

Indexed as

Latent Class AnalysisAdultBuprenorphineClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHarm ReductionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMethadoneNaloxoneNew EnglandOpiate Substitution TreatmentSubstance-Related DisordersBuprenorphineMethadoneNaloxoneBuprenorphineHealthcare accessMethadoneOpioidsPolysubstance useSyringe service programs

Identifiers

PMID33647590
PMCPMC7883735
OpenAlexW3133329368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.