ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2021
Reliability of Perceptual Judgments of Phonetic Accuracy and Hypernasality Among Speech-Language Pathologists for Children With Dysarthria.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptual Ratings Predict Speech Inversion Articulatory Kinematics in Childhood Speech Sound Disorders.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- Clinical Decision Support Using Speech Signal Analysis: Systematic Scoping Review of Neurological Disorders.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Speech-Language Pathologists' Ratings of Speech Accuracy in Children With Speech Sound Disorders.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose The objectives of this study were to: (a) compare interrater reliability of practicing speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) perceptual judgments of phonetic accuracy and hypernasality between children with dysarthria and those with typical development, and (b) to identify speech factors that influence reliability of these perceptual judgments for children with dysarthria. Method Ten SLPs provided ratings of speech samples from twenty 5-year-old children with dysarthria and twenty 5-year-old children with typical development on two tasks via a web-based platform: a hypernasality judgment task and a phonetic accuracy judgment task. Interrater reliability of SLPs' ratings on both tasks was compared between children with dysarthria and children with typical development. For children with dysarthria, four acoustic speech measures, intelligibility, and a measure of phonetic accuracy (percent stops correct) were examined as predictors of reliability of SLPs' perceptual judgments. Results Reliability of SLPs' phonetic accuracy judgments and hypernasality ratings was significantly lower for children with dysarthria than for children with typical development. Among children with dysarthria, interrater reliability of perceptual judgments ranged from strong to weak. Percent stops correct was the strongest predictor of interrater reliability for both phonetic accuracy judgments and hypernasality ratings. Conclusions Reliability of perceptual phonetic accuracy judgments and hypernasality ratings among practicing SLPs for children with dysarthria is reduced compared to ratings for children with typical development. Findings underscore the need for more reliable methods to assess phonetic accuracy and hypernasality for children with dysarthria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.