Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33647007›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Types of Parenchymal Changes Diagnosed on DMSA Scans of Kidneys Affected by Different Grades of Vesicoureteral Reflux.

Adela Arapović, Ante Punda, Dubravka Brdar, Vesna Čapkun, Diana Bajo, Daniela Veljačić, Hrvoje Punda, Ana Simičić-Majce, Mirna Saraga-Babić, Katarina Vukojević and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adela ArapovićDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
Ante PundaSchool of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Dubravka BrdarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
Vesna ČapkunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
Diana BajoDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
Daniela VeljačićDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
Hrvoje PundaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
Ana Simičić-MajceDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
Mirna Saraga-BabićDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Katarina VukojevićDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Marijan SaragaDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital in Split, Split, Croatia.
University of Split · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Renal parenchymal damage and scarring usually is associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), whereas the impact of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) on the kidneys is unclear. We aimed to compare kidneys with all grades of VUR (grades Io-V) and those without VUR by using direct radionuclide cystography, voiding cystourethrography, and findings from 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy (DMSA scan). MATERIAL AND METHODS The present analysis included 253 renal ureteral units (RUU) from 129 children with VUR and recurrent UTI and children with a single febrile UTI associated with abnormal ultrasonographic findings. The 6 grades of VUR (Io, I, II, III, IV, and V) and 35 RUUs without VUR were divided into 4 groups: 1. Non-dilated VUR (grades Io-II); 2. Mildly dilated VUR (grade III); 3. Dilated VUR (grades IV-V); and 4. The control group. RESULTS DMSA scanning showed significant differences between the groups with non-dilated VUR, grade III VUR, grades IV-V VUR, and the control group in kidney width (χ²=30.5; P<0.001); position and shape (χ²=30.6; P<0.001); intensity of activity (χ²=38.1; P<0.001); distribution of activity (χ²=34.5; P<0.001); and existence of scars (χ²=16; P<0.001). The probability of abnormalities on DMSA scans increased with the VUR grade. However, inside the groups of dilated and non-dilated VUR we found no significant statistical differences between those characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that kidneys without VUR or with non-dilated lateral VUR and dilated VUR on the contralateral side represent 2 different categories of parenchymal changes.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCicatrixFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKidneyMaleParenchymal TissueRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Dimercaptosuccinic AcidUreterUrinary Tract InfectionsUrinationRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid

Identifiers

PMID33647007
PMCPMC7934341
OpenAlexW3121337275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.