ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2023
Is the cochleovestibular nerve function affected in patients with hemifacial spasm?
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a motor disorder caused by the vascular compression of the facial nerve in the posterior fossa. The cochleovestibular nerve is close to the facial nerve and shares the same entry to the periphery, also has disorders caused by vascular compression. We evaluated the cochleovestibular nerve function in patients with HFS based on the hypothesis that vascular compression, which causes HFS, can also affect the nearby cochleovestibular nerve function. The medical charts of 49 patients with surgically confirmed HFS were reviewed retrospectively. The results of the pure-tone threshold, auditory brainstem response (ABR), video head impulse test (vHIT), and magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed. In each patient, the HFS side and the unaffected side were compared in the paired manner. The anterior inferior cerebellar artery was the major offending vessel (69.4%). There were no significant differences in the pure-tone threshold, properties of ABR waves, and vHIT gain. There was no evidence of cochleovestibular nerve compression syndrome in all patients. The angulation of the nerve by the offending vessel was more frequently identified in the HFS side than in the unaffected side (p = 0.040). The effect of HFS on cochleovestibular nerve function is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33646532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.