Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33646520›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021

Impact of COVID-19 on workload burden of a complex radiotherapy facility.

Giulio Francolini, Isacco Desideri, Giulia Stocchi, Lucia Pia Ciccone, Viola Salvestrini, Pietro Garlatti, Michele Aquilano, Daniela Greto, Pierluigi Bonomo, Icro Meattini and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Giulio FrancoliniCyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza, Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. francolinigiulio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1784-7203
Isacco DesideriDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giulia StocchiDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lucia Pia CicconeDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Viola SalvestriniDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Pietro GarlattiDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Michele AquilanoDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Daniela GretoRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Pierluigi BonomoRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Icro MeattiniRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Vieri ScottiRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Silvia ScocciantiRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Gabriele SimontacchiRadiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviDepartment of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCOVID-19 constitutes a worldwide threat, prompting Italian Government to implement specific measures on March 8, 2020, to protect patients and health workers from disease transmission. The impact of preventive measures on daily activity of a radiotherapy facility may hamper the ability to fulfill normal workload burden. Thus, we assessed the number of delivered treatments in a specific observation period after the adoption of preventive measures (since March 11 to April 24, 2020) and compared it with the corresponding period of the year 2019. MATERIALS AND

methodsOverall number of delivered fractions was related to actual time of platform daily activity and reported as a ratio between number of delivered fractions and activity hours (Fr/Hrs). Fr/Hrs were calculated and compared for two different periods of time, March 11-April 24, 2019 (Fr/Hrs1), and March 11-April 24, 2020 (Fr/Hrs2).

resultsFr/Hrs1 and Fr/Hrs2 were 2.66 and 2.54 for year 2019 and 2020, respectively, for a Fr/Hrs

conclusionPreventive measures did not influence workload burden performed. Automation in treatment delivery seems to compensate effectively for health workers number reduction.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health FacilitiesHumansItalyRadiotherapyWorkload

Identifiers

PMID33646520
PMCPMC7917169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.