Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33646510›Full record

ReviewTransgenic research2021

Targeted genome editing of plants and plant cells for biomanufacturing.

J F Buyel, E Stöger, L Bortesi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transgenic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Green Biologics: Harnessing the Power of Plants to Produce Pharmaceuticals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Product safety aspects of plant molecular farming.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Plastid Transformation: New Challenges in the Circular Economy Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

J F BuyelFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Forckenbeckstrasse 6, 52074, Aachen, Germany. johannes.buyel@rwth-aachen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-143X
E StögerDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
L BortesiAachen-Maastricht Institute for Biobased Materials (AMIBM), Maastricht University, Brightlands Chemelot Campus, Urmonderbaan 22, 6167 RD, Geleen, The Netherlands.
BOKU University · ATFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology · DEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Austrian Science Fund I2823-B25Austrian Science Fund FWF I 2823Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft 125-600164H2020 European Research Council 760331Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen 423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants have provided humans with useful products since antiquity, but in the last 30 years they have also been developed as production platforms for small molecules and recombinant proteins. This initially niche area has blossomed with the growth of the global bioeconomy, and now includes chemical building blocks, polymers and renewable energy. All these applications can be described as "plant molecular farming" (PMF). Despite its potential to increase the sustainability of biologics manufacturing, PMF has yet to be embraced broadly by industry. This reflects a combination of regulatory uncertainty, limited information on process cost structures, and the absence of trained staff and suitable manufacturing capacity. However, the limited adaptation of plants and plant cells to the requirements of industry-scale manufacturing is an equally important hurdle. For example, the targeted genetic manipulation of yeast has been common practice since the 1980s, whereas reliable site-directed mutagenesis in most plants has only become available with the advent of CRISPR/Cas9 and similar genome editing technologies since around 2010. Here we summarize the applications of new genetic engineering technologies to improve plants as biomanufacturing platforms. We start by identifying current bottlenecks in manufacturing, then illustrate the progress that has already been made and discuss the potential for improvement at the molecular, cellular and organism levels. We discuss the effects of metabolic optimization, adaptation of the endomembrane system, modified glycosylation profiles, programmable growth and senescence, protease inactivation, and the expression of enzymes that promote biodegradation. We outline strategies to achieve these modifications by targeted gene modification, considering case-by-case examples of individual improvements and the combined modifications needed to generate a new general-purpose "chassis" for PMF.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenome, PlantGene TargetingGenetic EngineeringPlant BreedingPlantsPlants, Genetically ModifiedChassisMetabolic optimizationModified glycosylationPlant molecular farmingProgrammable growth and senescenceProtease inactivation

Identifiers

PMID33646510
PMCPMC8316201
OpenAlexW3135753233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.