Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33646499›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

The contemporary pulmonary artery catheter. Part 2: measurements, limitations, and clinical applications.

I T Bootsma, E C Boerma, T W L Scheeren, F de Lange

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I T BootsmaDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, P.O. Box 888, 8901, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands. ingebootsma@gmail.com.
E C BoermaDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, P.O. Box 888, 8901, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
T W L ScheerenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9184-4190
F de LangeDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, P.O. Box 888, 8901, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, the classical pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has an almost 50-year-old history of its clinical use for hemodynamic monitoring. In recent years, the PAC evolved from a device that enabled intermittent cardiac output measurements in combination with static pressures to a monitoring tool that provides continuous data on cardiac output, oxygen supply and-demand balance, as well as right ventricular performance. In this review, which consists of two parts, we will introduce the difference between intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution using bolus injections, and the contemporary PAC enabling continuous measurements by using a thermal filament which heats up the blood. In this second part, we will discuss in detail the measurements of the contemporary PAC, including continuous cardiac output measurement, right ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume index, and mixed venous oxygen saturation. Limitations of all of these measurements are highlighted as well. We conclude that thorough understanding of measurements obtained from the PAC is the first step in successful application of the PAC in daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Pulmonary ArteryVentricular Function, RightCardiac OutputCatheterization, Swan-GanzCathetersHumansMiddle AgedStroke VolumeThermodilutionContinuous cardiac outputHemodynamic monitoringMixed venous oxygen saturationOxygen supply and -demand balancePulmonary artery catheterRight ventricular ejection fractionRight ventricular end-diastolic volumeThermodilution

Identifiers

PMID33646499
PMCPMC7917533
OpenAlexW3135532890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.