Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33646352›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2021

Spatially aware clustering of ion images in mass spectrometry imaging data using deep learning.

Wanqiu Zhang, Marc Claesen, Thomas Moerman, M Reid Groseclose, Etienne Waelkens, Bart De Moor, Nico Verbeeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Topological segmentation of mass spectrometry imaging data.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prospective on Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Diagnostics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emerging Computational Methods in Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Data parsing in mass spectrometry imaging using R Studio and Cardinal: A tutorial.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wanqiu ZhangKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. wanqiu.zhang@esat.kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1624-3421
Marc ClaesenAspect Analytics NV, C-mine 12, 3600, Genk, Belgium.
Thomas MoermanAspect Analytics NV, C-mine 12, 3600, Genk, Belgium.
M Reid GrosecloseBioimaging, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.
Etienne WaelkensKU Leuven, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Campus Gasthuisberg O&N1, Herestraat 49, Box 901, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart De MoorKU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing and Data Analytics, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Nico VerbeeckAspect Analytics NV, C-mine 12, 3600, Genk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational analysis is crucial to capitalize on the wealth of spatio-molecular information generated by mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) experiments. Currently, the spatial information available in MSI data is often under-utilized, due to the challenges of in-depth spatial pattern extraction. The advent of deep learning has greatly facilitated such complex spatial analysis. In this work, we use a pre-trained neural network to extract high-level features from ion images in MSI data, and test whether this improves downstream data analysis. The resulting neural network interpretation of ion images, coined neural ion images, is used to cluster ion images based on spatial expressions. We evaluate the impact of neural ion images on two ion image clustering pipelines, namely DBSCAN clustering, combined with UMAP-based dimensionality reduction, and k-means clustering. In both pipelines, we compare regular and neural ion images from two different MSI datasets. All tested pipelines could extract underlying spatial patterns, but the neural network-based pipelines provided better assignment of ion images, with more fine-grained clusters, and greater consistency in the spatial structures assigned to individual clusters. Additionally, we introduce the relative isotope ratio metric to quantitatively evaluate clustering quality. The resulting scores show that isotopical m/z values are more often clustered together in the neural network-based pipeline, indicating improved clustering outcomes. The usefulness of neural ion images extends beyond clustering towards a generic framework to incorporate spatial information into any MSI-focused machine learning pipeline, both supervised and unsupervised.

Indexed as

Deep learningIon image clusteringMass spectrometry imagingRepresentation learningSpatial pattern recognitionUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID33646352
PMCPMC8007517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.