ReviewDer Radiologe2021
[Imaging of the hand : What should be considered regarding the nerves?]
Review in Der Radiologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral nerve disorders of the hand and wrist are most commonly caused by entrapment neuropathies, while traumatic nerve injuries and neoplasms are less common.
objectivesThe indication for additional imaging methods and different imaging options, especially in patients with atypical symptoms or remaining unclear etiology of symptoms after completion of standard diagnostics, are presented. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe imaging methods magnetic resonance (MR) neurography and neurosonography are introduced, and typical findings as well as diagnostic pitfalls are presented.
resultsThe diagnostic gold standard, which comprises a past medical history, neurologic examination and electrophysiology, can often establish the diagnosis. Imaging methods, especially MR neurography and neurosonography, are gaining increasing importance in the diagnostic workup of atypical neuropathies, as well as in the determination of the exact lesion location and spatial lesion extension, especially for surgical planning. Recent technical advances allow high-resolution depiction of small distal terminal nerve branches.
conclusionsMR neurography allows for the high-resolution depiction of peripheral nerves of the hand and wrist. It can confirm the diagnosis of neuropathy, identify the exact lesion location, and rule out any differential diagnoses. Neurosonography is a time- and cost-efficient alternative diagnostic method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.