ArticleJAMA internal medicine2021
Severe Hypoglycemia Risk With Long-Acting Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bio-Inspired Artificial Intelligence Multimorbidity Score for Human-Machine Clinical Risk Stratification.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Declining incidence of hypoglycaemia in diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis: A nationwide cohort study from 2003 to 2022.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Real world evidence of insulin and biosimilar insulin therapy-Opportunities to improve adherence, outcomes and cost-effectiveness.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Review
- Time to Insulin Therapy and Severe Hypoglycemia in Korean Adults Initially Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Study.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Trends in anti-diabetic medication use, severe hyperglycaemia and severe hypoglycaemia among American Indian and Alaska Native Peoples, 2009-2013.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insights into clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence challenges.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Older Adults: What We Know and What We Have Yet to Learn.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Review
- Ambient Heat and Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Diabetes Using Insulin in the U.S. and Taiwan: A Cross-National Case-Crossover Study.Diabetes care · 2024Article
- 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.Diabetes care · 2024Review
- Metabolic Characteristics of Frail Older People with Diabetes Mellitus-A Systematic Search for Phenotypes.Metabolites · 2023Review
- Metabolic Impact of Frailty Changes Diabetes Trajectory.Metabolites · 2023Review
- Management of Glucose-Lowering Therapy in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Challenges and Opportunities.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Review
- 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Adherence to the therapeutic guidelines recommendations among the people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, frailty, or recent diagnosis, attended in primary health care centers in Spain: A cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- [Injection therapy of diabetes].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
- Hypoglycaemic therapy in frail older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus-a choice determined by metabolic phenotype.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022Review
- Update on the management of diabetes in long-term care facilities.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2022Review
- Risk Factors for Hypoglycemia During Treatment of Hyperglycemic Crises.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Previous studies have found that the risk of severe hypoglycemia does not differ between long-acting insulin analogs and neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, these studies did not focus on patients 65 years or older, who are at an increased risk for hypoglycemia, or did not include patients with concomitant prandial insulin use. Objective: To examine the risk of emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations for hypoglycemia among older community-residing patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated long-acting insulin or NPH insulin in real-world settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, new-user cohort study assessed Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older who initiated insulin glargine (n = 407 018), insulin detemir (n = 141 588), or NPH insulin (n = 26 402) from January 1, 2007, to July 31, 2019. Exposures: Insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and NPH insulin. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to first ED visit or hospitalization for hypoglycemia, defined using a modified validated algorithm. Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. The risk of recurring hypoglycemia events was estimated using the Andersen-Gill model. Post hoc analyses were conducted investigating possible effect modification by age. Results: Of the 575 008 patients initiating use of insulin (mean [SD] age 74.9 [6.7] years; 53% female), 407 018 used glargine, 141 588 used detemir, and 26 402 used NPH insulin. The study included 7347 ED visits or hospitalizations for hypoglycemia (5194 for glargine, 1693 for detemir, and 460 for NPH insulin, with a median follow-up across the 3 cohorts of 0.37 years (interquartile range, 0.20-0.76 years). Initiation of glargine and detemir use was associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin use (HR for glargine vs NPH insulin, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.80; HR, detemir vs NPH insulin, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63-0.82). The HRs were similar for the recurrent event analysis. The protective association of long-acting insulin analogs varied by age and was not seen with concomitant prandial insulin use. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, initiation of long-acting analogs was associated with a lower risk of ED visits or hospitalizations for hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin in older patients with type 2 diabetes in Medicare. However, this association was not seen with concomitant prandial insulin use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.